Literature DB >> 24404313

Use of portfolios for assessment of resident teaching skills.

Anthony A Donato, Ilene Harris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Portfolios are effective instruments for assessment of teaching skills among professional teachers and have recently been adapted in medical education. However, scoring rubrics are needed to effectively guide assessors. INTERVENTION: Portfolio assessors reviewed and made assessment comments about the resident-as-teacher sections of 11 internal medicine residents' electronic portfolios and discussed their assessments in an assessor group discussion. We performed qualitative analyses of written and oral comments. Major themes were identified, and member checking and triangulation with the literature was performed to evaluate the trustworthiness of the qualitative analysis.
RESULTS: Three faculty educators reviewed and commented on 241 uploaded e-portfolio documents accompanying reflections. Three major themes were identified: Application of Teaching Skills, Presentation Skills, and Insights as a Teacher. Themes and subthemes matched closely to several components of the conceptual framework of effective presentations formulated in Glassick standards for scholarly work, as well as themes found in assessments of professional teachers' portfolios.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessments of portfolios by experienced faculty educators appear to be useful for identifying many important facets of formal teaching presentations and may be useful for creation of a scoring rubric.

Year:  2013        PMID: 24404313      PMCID: PMC3771179          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00309.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  7 in total

1.  Residents-as-teachers training in U.S. residency programs and offices of graduate medical education.

Authors:  E H Morrison; J A Friedland; J Boker; L Rucker; J Hollingshead; P Murata
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment.

Authors:  M. Friedman Ben David; M. H. Davis; R. M. Harden; P. W. Howie; J. Ker; M. J. Pippard
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Amit K Ghosh; David A Cook; Patricia J Erwin; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Portfolios and the assessment of competence in nursing: a literature review.

Authors:  Tracey McCready
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Validity of portfolio assessment: which qualities determine ratings?

Authors:  Erik W Driessen; Karlijn Overeem; Jan van Tartwijk; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Arno M M Muijtjens
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  A systematic review protocol on the use of teaching portfolios for educators in further and higher education.

Authors:  Karen McColgan; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 7.  A systematic review of resident-as-teacher programmes.

Authors:  Andrew G Hill; Tzu-Chieh Yu; Mark Barrow; John Hattie
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.251

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Design of a clinical competency committee to maximize formative feedback.

Authors:  Anthony A Donato; Richard Alweis; Suzanne Wenderoth
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2016-12-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.