Susan Armijo-Olivo1, Jorge Fuentes2, Iain Muir3, Douglas P Gross1. 1. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta. 2. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta ; Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Maule, Talca, Chile. 3. Physiotherapy Alberta - College+Association, Edmonton, Alta.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the frequency and patterns of ultrasound (US) usage among physical therapists, to describe the most common purposes for using therapeutic US, and to investigate beliefs about therapeutic US. METHODS: A survey was sent to 95% of physical therapists licensed to practise in the province of Alberta, Canada. RESULTS: Of 2,269 physical therapists to whom email invitations were sent, 438 (19.3%) provided full responses. RESULTS indicate that US is still frequently incorporated into treatment regimens and is widely believed to be effective; however, the study also found a decrease in US usage over the past 15 years. While physical therapists recognize the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of US, many consider it clinically useful. Physical therapists using US rely largely on their clinical experience when making decisions about its use, but this depends on level of education: clinicians with an MScPT degree tended to base more of their US decisions on research evidence, likely because of the increasing emphasis on research evidence in graduate education. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the questionable effectiveness of therapeutic US, physical therapists still commonly use this treatment modality, largely because of a belief that US is clinically useful. However, US usage has decreased over the past 15 years.
PURPOSE: To explore the frequency and patterns of ultrasound (US) usage among physical therapists, to describe the most common purposes for using therapeutic US, and to investigate beliefs about therapeutic US. METHODS: A survey was sent to 95% of physical therapists licensed to practise in the province of Alberta, Canada. RESULTS: Of 2,269 physical therapists to whom email invitations were sent, 438 (19.3%) provided full responses. RESULTS indicate that US is still frequently incorporated into treatment regimens and is widely believed to be effective; however, the study also found a decrease in US usage over the past 15 years. While physical therapists recognize the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of US, many consider it clinically useful. Physical therapists using US rely largely on their clinical experience when making decisions about its use, but this depends on level of education: clinicians with an MScPT degree tended to base more of their US decisions on research evidence, likely because of the increasing emphasis on research evidence in graduate education. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the questionable effectiveness of therapeutic US, physical therapists still commonly use this treatment modality, largely because of a belief that US is clinically useful. However, US usage has decreased over the past 15 years.
Authors: Ruud M A Houben; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Pieter M J C Wolters; Madelon Peters; Suzanne G M Stomp-van den Berg Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.931