Literature DB >> 24403095

An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement.

Tam H Nguyen1, Hae-Ra Han, Miyong T Kim, Kitty S Chan.   

Abstract

The growing emphasis on patient-centered care has accelerated the demand for high-quality data from patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Traditionally, the development and validation of these measures has been guided by classical test theory. However, item response theory (IRT), an alternate measurement framework, offers promise for addressing practical measurement problems found in health-related research that have been difficult to solve through classical methods. This paper introduces foundational concepts in IRT, as well as commonly used models and their assumptions. Existing data on a combined sample (n = 636) of Korean American and Vietnamese American adults who responded to the High Blood Pressure Health Literacy Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 are used to exemplify typical applications of IRT. These examples illustrate how IRT can be used to improve the development, refinement, and evaluation of PRO measures. Greater use of methods based on this framework can increase the accuracy and efficiency with which PROs are measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24403095      PMCID: PMC4520411          DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  21 in total

1.  FDA guidance on patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jane Speight; Shalleen M Barendse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-21

2.  The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiative.

Authors:  David Cella; Cindy Nowinski; Amy Peterman; David Victorson; Deborah Miller; Jin-Shei Lai; Claudia Moy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Proposed changes for nurse education in England (UK) as a result of the Darzi report (DoH, 2008a) Health Quality Care for All--NHS next stage review final report: some initial observations.

Authors:  Karen Holland
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.281

4.  The efficacy of link items in the construction of a numeracy achievement scale--from kindergarten to year 6.

Authors:  Juho Looveer; Joanne Mulligan
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2009

5.  The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.

Authors:  Richard M Smith; Christie Plackner
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2009

6.  The patient-centered outcomes research institute: a 2013 agenda for "research done differently".

Authors:  Joe V Selby
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Development and validation of the high blood pressure-focused health literacy scale.

Authors:  Miyong T Kim; Hee-Jung Song; Hae-Ra Han; Youngshin Song; Soohyun Nam; Tam Hieu Nguyen; Ho-Chang Benjamin Lee; Kim B Kim
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-10-24

10.  Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data.

Authors:  Adam B Smith; Robert Rush; Lesley J Fallowfield; Galina Velikova; Michael Sharpe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  67 in total

1.  Development and Refinement of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing: A Brief Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Christy Cassarly; Lois J Matthews; Annie N Simpson; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Jessica I Billig; Erika D Sears; Breanna N Travis; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  THE DEPRESSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT SCALE: Assessment of Psychometric Properties Using Classical and Modern Measurement Theory in a CAN-BIND Trial.

Authors:  Anthony L Vaccarino; Amir H Kalali; Pierre Blier; Susan Gilbert Evans; Nina Engelhardt; Jane A Foster; Benicio N Frey; John H Greist; Kenneth A Kobak; Raymond W Lam; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Franca M Placenza; Sakina J Rizvi; Susan Rotzinger; David V Sheehan; Terrence Sills; Claudio N Soares; Gustavo Turecki; Rudolph Uher; Janet B W Williams; Sidney H Kennedy; Kenneth R Evans
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  The State of the Science of Health Literacy Measurement.

Authors:  Tam H Nguyen; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Lauren A McCormack
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

5.  A New Procedure to Assess When Estimates from the Cumulative Link Model Can Be Interpreted as Differences for Ordinal Scales in Quality of Life Studies.

Authors:  Yilin Ning; Peh Joo Ho; Nathalie C Støer; Ka Keat Lim; Hwee-Lin Wee; Mikael Hartman; Marie Reilly; Chuen Seng Tan
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Psychometric evaluation of a newly developed measure of emotionalism after stroke (TEARS-Q).

Authors:  Niall M Broomfield; Robert West; Allan House; Theresa Munyombwe; Mark Barber; Fergus Gracey; David C Gillespie; Matthew Walters
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.477

7.  A Rasch model analysis of two interpretations of 'not relevant' responses on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Ariel Z Mitev; Ákos Szabó; Zsuzsanna Beretzky; Adrienn K Poór; Péter Holló; Norbert Wikonkál; Miklós Sárdy; Sarolta Kárpáti; Andrea Szegedi; Éva Remenyik; Valentin Brodszky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet of Mindfulness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Amanda Shallcross; Nathaniel Y Lu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2020-01-10

9.  The Impact of Feeding on the Parent and Family Scales (Feeding Impact Scales): Development and Psychometric Testing.

Authors:  Hayley Henrikson Estrem; Britt Frisk Pados; Jinhee Park; Suzanne Thoyre; Cara McComish; Tam Nguyen
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2020-11-16

10.  Measurement properties of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains for children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ashima Singh; Mahua Dasgupta; Dawn Retherford; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Pippa M Simpson; Julie A Panepinto
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.