C A Wham1, K M Redwood, N Kerse. 1. C.A. Wham, Massey University, Institute of Food Nutrition and Human Health, Auckland, New Zealand, C.A.Wham@massey.ac.nz.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of the nutrition screening tool 'Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II' (SCREEN II) among a purposive sample of octogenarians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. SETTING: Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five community-living residents aged 85-86 years. Equal proportions of participants were recruited at low, medium and high nutrition risk based on their SCREEN II score 12 months prior. MEASUREMENTS: Nutrition risk was assessed using SCREEN II. Demographic and health data were established. Using established criterion a dietitian's nutrition risk rating assessment ranked participants from low risk (score of 1) to high risk (score of 10). The assessment included a medical history, anthropometric measures and dietary intake. Dietary intake was established from three 24 hour multiple pass recalls (MPR). A Spearman's correlation determined the association between the SCREEN II score and the dietitian's risk score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were completed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off point for high nutrition risk. RESULTS: The SCREEN II score was significantly correlated with the dietitian's risk rating (rs = -0.76 (p<0.01). A newly defined cut-off point <49 was established for high nutrition risk derived from ROC curves and AUC (0.87, p < 0.01); sensitivity 90% and specificity 86%. CONCLUSION: SCREEN II is a simple, easy to use, 14 item questionnaire and appears to be a valid tool for detection of nutrition risk people aged 85-86 years.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of the nutrition screening tool 'Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, version II' (SCREEN II) among a purposive sample of octogenarians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. SETTING: Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five community-living residents aged 85-86 years. Equal proportions of participants were recruited at low, medium and high nutrition risk based on their SCREEN II score 12 months prior. MEASUREMENTS: Nutrition risk was assessed using SCREEN II. Demographic and health data were established. Using established criterion a dietitian's nutrition risk rating assessment ranked participants from low risk (score of 1) to high risk (score of 10). The assessment included a medical history, anthropometric measures and dietary intake. Dietary intake was established from three 24 hour multiple pass recalls (MPR). A Spearman's correlation determined the association between the SCREEN II score and the dietitian's risk score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were completed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off point for high nutrition risk. RESULTS: The SCREEN II score was significantly correlated with the dietitian's risk rating (rs = -0.76 (p<0.01). A newly defined cut-off point <49 was established for high nutrition risk derived from ROC curves and AUC (0.87, p < 0.01); sensitivity 90% and specificity 86%. CONCLUSION: SCREEN II is a simple, easy to use, 14 item questionnaire and appears to be a valid tool for detection of nutrition risk people aged 85-86 years.
Authors: A Pereira da Silva; A Matos; A Valente; Â Gil; I Alonso; R Ribeiro; M Bicho; J Gorjão-Clara Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: N C Htun; K Ishikawa-Takata; A Kuroda; T Tanaka; T Kikutani; S P Obuchi; H Hirano; K Iijima Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Jos W Borkent; Elke Naumann; Emmelyne Vasse; Ellen van der Heijden; Marian A E de van der Schueren Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Emma Tenison; Fiona E Lithander; Matthew D Smith; Danielle Pendry-Brazier; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Emily J Henderson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 3.006