| Literature DB >> 24402156 |
Teiliane Rodrigues Carneiro1, Regina Helena Saramago Peralta2, Marta Cristhiany Cunha Pinheiro1, Sara Menezes de Oliveira1, José Mauro Peralta3, Fernando Schemelzer Moraes Bezerra1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method to detect Schistosoma mansoni DNA in stool samples from individuals living in a low-endemicity area in Brazil. Of the 125 initial stool samples, 80 were ELISA reactive and eggs were identified in 19 of the samples by parasitological examination. For the PCR evaluations, 56 stool samples were selected and divided into five groups. Groups I-IV were scored negative for S. mansoni eggs by parasitological examination. Groups I and II were ELISA reactive, whereas Groups III and IV were ELISA nonreactive. Groups II and III were positive for other intestinal parasites. PCR testing scored eight samples as positive from these four groups. Group V represented the S. mansoni -positive group and it included ELISA-reactive samples that were scored positive for S. mansoni by one or more parasitological examinations (6/19 were positive by Kato-Katz method, 9/17 by saline gradient and 10/13 by Helmintex®). PCR scored 13 of these 19 samples as positive for S. mansoni . We conclude that while none of these methods yielded 100% sensitivity, a combination of techniques should be effective for improving the detection of S. mansoni infection in low-endemicity areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24402156 PMCID: PMC4005555 DOI: 10.1590/0074-0276130202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Results of Hoffman and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods from stool samples of Groups II and III
| Groups | Individuals | Hoffman | PCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| II | A1 |
| N |
| A2 |
| N | |
| A3 |
| P | |
| A4 |
| N | |
| A5 |
| P | |
| A6 |
| N | |
| A7 |
| N | |
| A8 |
| N | |
| A9 |
| N | |
| A10 |
| N | |
| III | C1 |
| N |
| C2 |
| N | |
| C3 |
| N | |
| C4 |
| N | |
| C5 |
| N | |
| C6 |
| N | |
| C7 |
| P |
N: negative; P: positive.
Comparison between the reference method Kato-Katz (KK) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for schistosomiasis detection
| PCR | KK n (%) | Total n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P | N | ||
| P | 5 | 8 | 13 (68.4) |
| N | 1 | 5 | 6 (31.6) |
| Total | 6 (31.6) | 13 (68.4) | 19 (100) |
N: negative; P: positive.
Comparison between the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and saline gradient methods for schistosomiasis detection
| PCR | Saline gradient n (%) | Total n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P | N | ||
| P | 7 | 4 | 11 (64.7) |
| N | 2 | 4 | 6 (35.3) |
| Total | 9 (52.9) | 8 (47.1) | 17 (100) |
N: negative; P: positive.
Comparison between the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Helmintex ® methods for schistosomiasis detection
| PCR | Helmintex ® n (%) | Total n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P | N | ||
| P | 7 | 1 | 8 (61.5) |
| N | 3 | 2 | 5 (38.5) |
| Total | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.1) | 13 (100) |
N: negative; P: positive.
Results of Kato-Katz (KK), saline gradient, Helmintex ® and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods from stool samples of Group V for the presence of Schistosoma mansoni
| Individuals | Parasitological methods (EPG) | PCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KK | Saline gradient | Helmintex ® | ||
| E1 | N | P (10.0) | N | P |
| E2 | N | N | P (0.10) | N |
| E3 | N | P (2.0) | P (0.13) | P |
| E4 | N | N | P (0.17) | P |
| E5 | P (8.0) | P (10.0) | P (0.47) | P |
| E6 | N | P (6.0) | P (0.13) | P |
| E7 | P (8.0) | NR | P (4.77) | P |
| E8 | N | P (2.0) | N | N |
| E9 | N | P (6.0) | NB | P |
| E10 | N | P (2.0) | NB | P |
| E11 | P (8.0) | NR | NB | P |
| E12 | P (8.0) | N | NB | P |
| E13 | N | N | P (0.20) | P |
| E14 | P (8.0) | N | N | N |
| E15 | N | P (2.0) | NB | N |
| E16 | P (8.0) | N | P (0.20) | P |
| E17 | N | N | P (0.20) | N |
| E18 | N | P (2.0) | NB | P |
| E19 | N | N | P (0.30) | N |
EPG: eggs per gram; N: negative; NR: not realised; P: positive.