OBJECTIVES: We previously reported inferior outcomes for locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab (C225) versus cisplatin (CDDP). We now examine if this difference persists when accounting for HPV status and update outcomes on the entire cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 3/106 to 4/1/08, 174 locally advanced head and neck cancer patients received definitive treatment with RT and CDDP (n=125) or RT and C225 (n=49). Of these, 62 patients had tissue available for HPV analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 47 months. The 3-year loco-regional failure, disease-free survival, and overall survival for CDDP versus C225 were 5.7% versus 40.2% (P<0.0001), 85.1% versus 35.4% (P<0.0001), and 90.0% versus 56.6% (P<0.0001), respectively. In the subset with tissue, there was no difference in rates of HPV or p16 positivity between the 2 groups. In this subset, the 3-year loco-regional failure, disease-free survival, and overall survival for CDDP versus C225 were 5.3% versus 32.0% (P=0.01), 86.8% versus 43.2% (P=0.002), and 86.7% versus 76.9% (P=0.09), respectively. Multivariate analysis continued to show a benefit for CDDP. CONCLUSIONS: With longer follow-up and the inclusion of HPV and p16 status for about one third of patients where tissue was available, we continued to find superior outcomes with concurrent CDDP versus C225.
OBJECTIVES: We previously reported inferior outcomes for locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab (C225) versus cisplatin (CDDP). We now examine if this difference persists when accounting for HPV status and update outcomes on the entire cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 3/106 to 4/1/08, 174 locally advanced head and neck cancerpatients received definitive treatment with RT and CDDP (n=125) or RT and C225 (n=49). Of these, 62 patients had tissue available for HPV analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 47 months. The 3-year loco-regional failure, disease-free survival, and overall survival for CDDP versus C225 were 5.7% versus 40.2% (P<0.0001), 85.1% versus 35.4% (P<0.0001), and 90.0% versus 56.6% (P<0.0001), respectively. In the subset with tissue, there was no difference in rates of HPV or p16 positivity between the 2 groups. In this subset, the 3-year loco-regional failure, disease-free survival, and overall survival for CDDP versus C225 were 5.3% versus 32.0% (P=0.01), 86.8% versus 43.2% (P=0.002), and 86.7% versus 76.9% (P=0.09), respectively. Multivariate analysis continued to show a benefit for CDDP. CONCLUSIONS: With longer follow-up and the inclusion of HPV and p16 status for about one third of patients where tissue was available, we continued to find superior outcomes with concurrent CDDP versus C225.
Authors: Gregory T Wolf; Susan Gross Fisher; Waun Ki Hong; Robert Hillman; Monica Spaulding; George E Laramore; James W Endicott; Kenneth McClatchey; William G Henderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adrian R Levy; Karissa M Johnston; Jennifer Sambrook; Bonnie Donato; John R Penrod; Mitra Corral; Martin Chasen Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Lauren Q Shapiro; Eric J Sherman; Nadeem Riaz; Jeremy Setton; Lawrence Koutcher; Zhigang Zhang; Weiji Shi; Matthew G Fury; Suzanne L Wolden; David G Pfister; Luc Morris; Nancy Lee Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Lorraine Walsh; Charles Gillham; Mary Dunne; Ian Fraser; Donal Hollywood; John Armstrong; Pierre Thirion Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Jimmy J Caudell; Stephen M Sawrie; Sharon A Spencer; Renee A Desmond; William R Carroll; Glenn E Peters; Lisle M Nabell; Ruby F Meredith; James A Bonner Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: James A Bonner; Paul M Harari; Jordi Giralt; Roger B Cohen; Christopher U Jones; Ranjan K Sur; David Raben; Jose Baselga; Sharon A Spencer; Junming Zhu; Hagop Youssoufian; Eric K Rowinsky; K Kian Ang Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Desmond Curran; Jordi Giralt; Paul M Harari; K Kian Ang; Roger B Cohen; Merrill S Kies; Jacek Jassem; José Baselga; Eric K Rowinsky; Nadia Amellal; Sylvie Comte; James A Bonner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shilpa Bhatia; Jaspreet Sharma; Sanjana Bukkapatnam; Ayman Oweida; Shelby Lennon; Andy Phan; Dallin Milner; Nomin Uyanga; Antonio Jimeno; David Raben; Hilary Somerset; Lynn Heasley; Sana D Karam Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William A Stokes; Whitney A Sumner; Kiersten L Breggren; John T Rathbun; David Raben; Jessica D McDermott; Gregory Gan; Sana D Karam Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2017-08-02
Authors: Maura L Gillison; Andy M Trotti; Jonathan Harris; Avraham Eisbruch; Paul M Harari; David J Adelstein; Richard C K Jordan; Weiqiang Zhao; Erich M Sturgis; Barbara Burtness; John A Ridge; Jolie Ringash; James Galvin; Min Yao; Shlomo A Koyfman; Dukagjin M Blakaj; Mohammed A Razaq; A Dimitrios Colevas; Jonathan J Beitler; Christopher U Jones; Neal E Dunlap; Samantha A Seaward; Sharon Spencer; Thomas J Galloway; Jack Phan; James J Dignam; Quynh Thu Le Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Oleksandr Ekshyyan; Alok R Khandelwal; Xiaohua Rong; Tara Moore-Medlin; Xiaohui Ma; Jonathan Steven Alexander; Cherie-Ann O Nathan Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Lauren Q Shapiro; Eric J Sherman; Nadeem Riaz; Jeremy Setton; Lawrence Koutcher; Zhigang Zhang; Weiji Shi; Matthew G Fury; Suzanne L Wolden; David G Pfister; Luc Morris; Nancy Lee Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 5.337