Literature DB >> 18355979

Locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with primary radiotherapy: a comparison of the addition of cetuximab or chemotherapy and the impact of protocol treatment.

Jimmy J Caudell1, Stephen M Sawrie, Sharon A Spencer, Renee A Desmond, William R Carroll, Glenn E Peters, Lisle M Nabell, Ruby F Meredith, James A Bonner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The addition of platinum-based chemotherapy (ChRT) or cetuximab (ExRT) to concurrent radiotherapy (RT) has resulted in improved survival in Phase III studies for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). However the optimal treatment regimen has not been defined. A retrospective study was performed to compare outcomes in patients who were treated definitively with ExRT or ChRT.
METHODS: Cetuximab with concurrent RT was used to treat 29 patients with LAHNC, all of whom had tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx. All patients were T2 to T4 and overall American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III to IVB, with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 60 or greater. ChRT was used to treat 103 patients with similar characteristics. Patients were evaluated for locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Median follow-up for patients alive at last contact was 83 months for those treated with ExRT and 53 months for those treated with ChRT. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess independent prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The LRC, DMFS, and DSS were not significantly different, with 3-year rates of 70.7%, 92.4%, and 78.6% for ExRT and 74.7%, 86.6%, and 76.5% for ChRT, respectively. The OS was significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.02), with 3-year rates of 75.9% for ExRT and 61.3% for ChRT. OS was not significant when patients who were on protocol treatments of ExRT or ChRT were compared. Also, OS was not significant when multivariate analysis was used to control for potential confounding factors.
CONCLUSION: In our single-institution retrospective review of patients treated with ExRT or ChRT, no significant differences were found in LRC, DMFS, DSS, or OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355979     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  37 in total

Review 1.  Promising systemic immunotherapies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Neil Gildener-Leapman; Robert L Ferris; Julie E Bauman
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.337

2.  Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Cisplatin Versus Cetuximab for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Nadeem Riaz; Eric Sherman; Lawrence Koutcher; Lauren Shapiro; Nora Katabi; Zhigang Zhang; Weiji Shi; Mathew Fury; Richard Wong; Suzanne Wolden; Shyam Rao; Nancy Lee
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Cisplatin versus cetuximab given concomitantly with radiotherapy in non-resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an open question.

Authors:  Jacopo Giuliani; Andrea Bonetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Inhibition of EphB4-Ephrin-B2 Signaling Enhances Response to Cetuximab-Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Shilpa Bhatia; Jaspreet Sharma; Sanjana Bukkapatnam; Ayman Oweida; Shelby Lennon; Andy Phan; Dallin Milner; Nomin Uyanga; Antonio Jimeno; David Raben; Hilary Somerset; Lynn Heasley; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy vs. cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy for p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer: an updated meta-analysis including trials RTOG 1016 and De-ESCALaTE.

Authors:  Petar Suton; Marko Skelin; Zoran Rakusic; Stjepan Dokuzovic; Ivica Luksic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Concurrent use of cisplatin or cetuximab with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Antonin Levy; Pierre Blanchard; Sara Bellefqih; Nacéra Brahimi; Joël Guigay; François Janot; Stéphane Temam; Jean Bourhis; Eric Deutsch; Nicolas Daly-Schveitzer; Yungan Tao
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Individualization of cancer treatment from radiotherapy perspective.

Authors:  Ala Yaromina; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Radiochemoimmunotherapy with intensity-modulated concomitant boost: interim analysis of the REACH trial.

Authors:  Alexandra D Jensen; Jürgen Krauss; Karin Potthoff; Christian Simon; Anna V Nikoghosyan; Karen Lossner; Jürgen Debus; Marc W Münter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  A comparison of concurrent cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiotherapy in locally-advanced head and neck cancer: A bi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  William A Stokes; Whitney A Sumner; Kiersten L Breggren; John T Rathbun; David Raben; Jessica D McDermott; Gregory Gan; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-02

10.  Cisplatin versus cetuximab given concurrently with definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jessica Ley; Paul Mehan; Tanya M Wildes; Wade Thorstad; Hiram A Gay; Loren Michel; Brian Nussenbaum; Kathryn Trinkaus; Douglas Adkins
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.