Literature DB >> 24399417

Nomograms for preoperative prediction of prognosis in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Pablo H Montero1, Changhong Yu, Frank L Palmer, Purvi D Patel, Ian Ganly, Jatin P Shah, Ashok R Shaha, Jay O Boyle, Dennis H Kraus, Bhuvanesh Singh, Richard J Wong, Luc G Morris, Michael W Kattan, Snehal G Patel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to develop prognostic tools that will accurately predict overall and cancer-related mortality and risk of recurrence in individual patients with oral cancer based on host and tumor characteristics. These tools would take into account numerous prognosticators beyond those covered by the traditional TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging system.
METHODS: Demographic, host, and tumor characteristics of 1617 patients with cancer of the oral cavity, who were treated primarily with surgery at a single-institution tertiary care cancer center between 1985 and 2009, were reviewed from a preexisting database. Recurrent disease was recorded in 509 patients (456 locoregional and 116 distant); 328 patients died of cancer-related causes, and 542 died of other causes. The median follow-up was 42 months (range, 1-300 months). The following variables were analyzed as predictors of prognosis: age, sex, race, alcohol and tobacco use, oral cavity subsite, invasion of other structures, comorbidity, tumor size, and clinical nodal status. The stepdown method was used to select the statistically most influential predictors for inclusion in the final nomogram for each outcome of interest.
RESULTS: The most influential predictors of both recurrence and cancer-specific mortality probability (CSMP) were tumor size, nodal status, subsite, and bone invasion. Nomograms were generated for prediction of overall survival (OS), CSMP, and locoregional recurrence-free probability (LRRFP). The nomograms were internally validated with an overfit-corrected predictive discrimination metric (concordance index) for OS of 67%, CSMP of 66%, and LRRFP of 60%.
CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms have been developed that can reasonably estimate OS, CSMP, and LRRFP based on specific tumor and host characteristics in patients with oral cancer.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck cancer; nomogram; oral cancer; oral cavity cancer; outcome prognosis; predictive tools; recurrence prognosis; survival prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24399417     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Nomogram Identifies Age as the Most Important Predictor of Overall Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer After Primary Surgery.

Authors:  Supriya Gupta; Jennifer Waller; Jimmy Brown; Yolanda Elam; James V Rawson; Darko Pucar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-16

2.  Independent Predictors of Prognosis Based on Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgical Margins.

Authors:  Marisa R Buchakjian; Timothy Ginader; Kendall K Tasche; Nitin A Pagedar; Brian J Smith; Steven M Sperry
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Defining value-driven care in head and neck oncology.

Authors:  Benjamin R Roman; Mahmoud I Awad; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Influence of extracapsular nodal spread extent on prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Volkert B Wreesmann; Nora Katabi; Frank L Palmer; Pablo H Montero; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Mithat Gönen; Diane Carlson; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; Ronald Ghossein; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Neck recurrence in clinically node-negative oral cancer: 27-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Aviram Mizrachi; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Pablo H Montero; Sean McBride; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Pretreatment peripheral blood leukocytes are independent predictors of survival in oral cavity cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Valero; Daniella K Zanoni; Marlena R McGill; Ian Ganly; Luc G T Morris; Miquel Quer; Jatin P Shah; Richard J Wong; Xavier León; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Individualized risk prediction of outcomes for oral cavity cancer patients.

Authors:  Victoria Prince; Emily L Bellile; Yilun Sun; Gregory T Wolf; Connor W Hoban; Andrew G Shuman; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  The role of adjuvant treatment in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: An international collaborative study.

Authors:  Eran Fridman; Shorook Na'ara; Jaiprakash Agarwal; Moran Amit; Gideon Bachar; Andrea Bolzoni Villaret; Jose Brandao; Claudio R Cernea; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Jonathan Clark; Ardalan Ebrahimi; Dan M Fliss; Sashikanth Jonnalagadda; Hugo F Kohler; Luiz P Kowalski; Matthias Kreppel; Chun-Ta Liao; Snehal G Patel; Rajan S Patel; K Thomas Robbins; Jatin P Shah; Thomas Shpitzer; Tzu-Chen Yen; Joachim E Zöller; Ziv Gil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  New AJCC: How does it impact oral cancers?

Authors:  Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 5.337

10.  Nomograms for predicting survival and recurrence in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma. An international collaborative study.

Authors:  Ian Ganly; Moran Amit; Lei Kou; Frank L Palmer; Jocelyn Migliacci; Nora Katabi; Changhong Yu; Michael W Kattan; Yoav Binenbaum; Kanika Sharma; Ramer Naomi; Agbetoba Abib; Brett Miles; Xinjie Yang; Delin Lei; Kristine Bjoerndal; Christian Godballe; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Dan Fliss; André M Eckardt; Copelli Chiara; Enrico Sesenna; Safina Ali; Lukas Czerwonka; David P Goldstein; Ziv Gil; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.