Literature DB >> 24399097

Points to consider in the clinical use of NGS panels for mitochondrial disease: an analysis of gene inclusion and consent forms.

Julia Platt1, Rachel Cox, Gregory M Enns.   

Abstract

Mitochondrial next generation sequencing (NGS) panels offer single-step analysis of the numerous nuclear genes involved in the structure, function, and maintenance of mitochondria. However, the complexities of mitochondrial biology and genetics raise points for consideration in clinical use of these tests. To understand the current status of mitochondrial genetic testing, we assessed the gene offerings and consent forms of mitochondrial NGS panels available from seven US-based clinical laboratories. The NGS panels varied markedly in number of genes (101-1204 genes), and the proportion of genes causing "classic" mitochondrial diseases and their phenocopies ranged widely between labs (18 %-94 % of panel contents). All panels included genes not associated with classic mitochondrial diseases (6 %-28 % of panel contents), including genes causing adult-onset neurodegenerative disorders, cancer predisposition, and other genetic syndromes or inborn errors of metabolism. Five of the panels included genes that are not listed in OMIM to be associated with a disease phenotype (5 %-49 % of panel contents). None of the consent documents reviewed had options for patient preference regarding receipt of incidental findings. These findings raise points of discussion applicable to mitochondrial diagnostics, but also to the larger arenas of exome and genome sequencing, including the need to consider the boundaries between clinical and research testing, the necessity of appropriate informed consent, and the responsibilities of clinical laboratories and clinicians. Based on these findings, we recommend careful evaluation by laboratories of the genes offered on NGS panels, clear communication of the predicted phenotypes, and revised consent forms to allow patients to make choices about receiving incidental findings. We hope that our analysis and recommendations will help to maximize the considerable clinical utility of NGS panels for the diagnosis of mitochondrial disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24399097     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9683-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  22 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial respiratory-chain diseases.

Authors:  Salvatore DiMauro; Eric A Schon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Recent advances in the genetics of mitochondrial encephalopathies.

Authors:  Elena J Tucker; Alison G Compton; David R Thorburn
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Molecular diagnosis of infantile mitochondrial disease with targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Sarah E Calvo; Alison G Compton; Steven G Hershman; Sze Chern Lim; Daniel S Lieber; Elena J Tucker; Adrienne Laskowski; Caterina Garone; Shangtao Liu; David B Jaffe; John Christodoulou; Janice M Fletcher; Damien L Bruno; Jack Goldblatt; Salvatore Dimauro; David R Thorburn; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  D R Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Diagnostic criteria for respiratory chain disorders in adults and children.

Authors:  F P Bernier; A Boneh; X Dennett; C W Chow; M A Cleary; D R Thorburn
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Practices and policies of clinical exome sequencing providers: analysis and implications.

Authors:  Seema M Jamal; Joon-Ho Yu; Jessica X Chong; Karin M Dent; Jessie H Conta; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 7.  Next generation molecular diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders.

Authors:  Lee-Jun C Wong
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.160

8.  A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology.

Authors:  David J Pagliarini; Sarah E Calvo; Betty Chang; Sunil A Sheth; Scott B Vafai; Shao-En Ong; Geoffrey A Walford; Canny Sugiana; Avihu Boneh; William K Chen; David E Hill; Marc Vidal; James G Evans; David R Thorburn; Steven A Carr; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Mitochondrial disease in childhood: nuclear encoded.

Authors:  Amy C Goldstein; Poonam Bhatia; Jodie M Vento
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  9 in total

1.  My Identical Twin Sequenced our Genome.

Authors:  Samantha L P Schilit; Arielle Schilit Nitenson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Review of Commercially Available Epilepsy Genetic Panels.

Authors:  Chelsea Chambers; Laura A Jansen; Radhika Dhamija
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered.

Authors:  Rhodé M Bijlsma; Annelien L Bredenoord; Christa G Gadellaa-Hooijdonk; Martijn Pj Lolkema; Stefan Sleijfer; Emile E Voest; Margreet Gem Ausems; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Panel-based genetic diagnostic testing for inherited eye diseases is highly accurate and reproducible, and more sensitive for variant detection, than exome sequencing.

Authors:  Mark B Consugar; Daniel Navarro-Gomez; Emily M Place; Kinga M Bujakowska; Maria E Sousa; Zoë D Fonseca-Kelly; Daniel G Taub; Maria Janessian; Dan Yi Wang; Elizabeth D Au; Katherine B Sims; David A Sweetser; Anne B Fulton; Qin Liu; Janey L Wiggs; Xiaowu Gai; Eric A Pierce
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  A protocol for the identification and validation of novel genetic causes of kidney disease.

Authors:  Andrew Mallett; Chirag Patel; Barbara Maier; Julie McGaughran; Michael Gabbett; Minoru Takasato; Anne Cameron; Peter Trnka; Stephen I Alexander; Gopala Rangan; Michel C Tchan; Georgina Caruana; George John; Cathy Quinlan; Hugh J McCarthy; Valentine Hyland; Wendy E Hoy; Ernst Wolvetang; Ryan Taft; Cas Simons; Helen Healy; Melissa Little
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 7.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology: Genetic Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Cancer Classification.

Authors:  Rick Kamps; Rita D Brandão; Bianca J van den Bosch; Aimee D C Paulussen; Sofia Xanthoulea; Marinus J Blok; Andrea Romano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2015-08-25

9.  Whole-exome Sequencing Helps the Diagnosis and Treatment in Children with Neurodevelopmental Delay Accompanied Unexplained Dyspnea.

Authors:  Wenjia Tong; Yajian Wang; Yun Lu; Tongsheng Ye; Conglei Song; Yuanyuan Xu; Min Li; Jie Ding; Yuanyuan Duan; Le Zhang; Weiyue Gu; Xiaoling Zhao; Xiu-An Yang; Danqun Jin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.