Literature DB >> 24398365

MRI information for commonly used otologic implants: review and update.

Roya Azadarmaki1, Rhonda Tubbs, Douglas A Chen, Frank G Shellock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review information on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) issues for commonly used otologic implants. DATA SOURCES: Manufacturing companies, National Library of Medicine's online database, and an additional online database (www.MRIsafety.com). REVIEW
METHODS: A literature review of the National Library of Medicine's online database with focus on MRI issues for otologic implants was performed. The MRI information on implants provided by manufacturers was reviewed.
RESULTS: Baha and Ponto Pro osseointegrated implants' abutment and fixture and the implanted magnet of the Sophono Alpha 1 and 2 abutment-free systems are approved for 3-Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) systems. The external processors of these devices are MR Unsafe. Of the implants tested, middle ear ossicular prostheses, including stapes prostheses, except for the 1987 McGee prosthesis, are MR Conditional for 1.5-Tesla (and many are approved for 3-Tesla) MR systems. Cochlear implants with removable magnets are approved for patients undergoing MRI at 1.5 Tesla after magnet removal. The MED-EL PULSAR, SONATA, CONCERT, and CONCERT PIN cochlear implants can be used in patients undergoing MRI at 1.5 Tesla with application of a protective bandage. The MED-EL COMBI 40+ can be used in 0.2-Tesla MR systems. Implants made from nonmagnetic and nonconducting materials are MR Safe.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of MRI guidelines for commonly used otologic implants is important. Guidelines on MRI issues approved by the US Food and Drug Administration are not always the same compared with other parts of the world. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This monograph provides a current reference for physicians on MRI issues for commonly used otologic implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baha; MRI safety; Ponto Pro; Sophono; Vibrant Soundbridge; cochlear implants; endolymphatic shunts; middle ear implantable hearing device; middle ear prosthesis; osseointegrated cochlear simulators; otologic implants; stapes prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24398365     DOI: 10.1177/0194599813518306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; M A Brockmann; A Läßig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Heather Bortfeld; Daniel J Levitin; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patient with a Novel MRI-Compatible Auditory Brainstem Implant.

Authors:  Matthew Shew; Judson Bertsch; Paul Camarata; Hinrich Staecker
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2017-01

4.  Stability of the standard incus coupling of the Carina middle ear actuator after 1.5T MRI.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nicolas Verhaert; Farida Benoudiba; Marie-France Bellin; Dennis Ducreux; Jean-François Papon; Jérôme Nevoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.