Literature DB >> 24397569

A study on variability of quantitative sensory testing in healthy participants and painful temporomandibular disorder patients.

Guangju Yang1, Lene Baad-Hansen, Kelun Wang, Qiu-Fei Xie, Peter Svensson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Quantitative sensory testing has mainly used thresholds to evaluate somatosensory sensitivity so far. The variability of different measures from session to session has also been investigated, but the variability of the single individual measures of a threshold or subject-based reports has not been considered. This study aimed to investigate the potential value of threshold variability in one session as a measure of internal consistency in somatosensory function.
METHODS: The standardized quantitative sensory testing battery developed by the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain was performed bilaterally over the infraorbital, mental, and hand regions in 70 healthy and 22 temporomandibular disorder pain participants. Somatosensory variability was investigated by calculating the Coefficient of Variation of three to five repeated measures in one threshold determination. The influences of side, gender, site, age, and presence of pain on the somatosensory variability were evaluated.
RESULTS: In the healthy participants, somatosensory variability was region dependent: hand > mental and/or infraorbital for CDT, WDT, HPT, MDT-N, MPT-Y, MPT-N, WUR, and MPS (p ≤ 0.043), infraorbital > hand for VDT (p = 0.001), mental > infraorbital for HPT and WUR (p ≤ 0.001); and age dependent for WDT, TSL, CPT, HPT, MDT-Y, MDT-N, MPT-N, and WUR (p ≤ 0.017). Gender and side had no main effect on variability (p ≥ 0.136). The pain patients presented higher variability compared with healthy participants for TSL, MDT-N, MPT-Y, WUR, and PPT (p ≤ 0.033). DISCUSSION: The somatosensory variability along with the threshold would be a more complete method to investigate the somatosensory disorders and underlying pain mechanisms. The correlation between pain duration and somatosensory variability should be studied further with different pain conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coefficient of Variation; Quantitative sensory testing; somatosensory variability; temporomandibular disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24397569     DOI: 10.3109/08990220.2013.869493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  9 in total

1.  Electroencephalography Signatures for Conditioned Pain Modulation and Pain Perception in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain-An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Paulo E P Teixeira; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Elif Uygur-Kucukseymen; Roberto Mathias Machado; Ana Balbuena-Pareja; Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Maria Alejandra Luna-Cuadros; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Paola Gonzalez-Mego; Piero F Mejia-Pando; Timothy Wagner; Laura Dipietro; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.637

2.  Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study.

Authors:  L Baad-Hansen; M Pigg; G Yang; T List; P Svensson; M Drangsholt
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 3.  Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Martin S Angst; Raymond Dionne; Roy Freeman; Per Hansson; Simon Haroutounian; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Nadine Attal; Ralf Baron; Joanna Brell; Shay Bujanover; Laurie B Burke; Daniel Carr; Amy S Chappell; Penney Cowan; Mila Etropolski; Roger B Fillingim; Jennifer S Gewandter; Nathaniel P Katz; Ernest A Kopecky; John D Markman; George Nomikos; Linda Porter; Bob A Rappaport; Andrew S C Rice; Joseph M Scavone; Joachim Scholz; Lee S Simon; Shannon M Smith; Jeffrey Tobias; Tina Tockarshewsky; Christine Veasley; Mark Versavel; Ajay D Wasan; Warren Wen; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Canadian Orofacial Pain Team workshop report on the global year against orofacial pain.

Authors:  Gilles J Lavigne; Barry J Sessle
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on painful temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Adila Aisaiti; Yanli Zhou; Yue Wen; Weina Zhou; Chen Wang; Jing Zhao; Linfeng Yu; Jinglu Zhang; Kelun Wang; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Age Differences in Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing and Associations With Brain Volume.

Authors:  Alisa J Johnson; Abigail T Wilson; Chavier Laffitte Nodarse; Soamy Montesino-Goicolea; Pedro A Valdes-Hernandez; Jessie Somerville; Julio A Peraza; Roger B Fillingim; Joel Bialosky; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2021-08-22

7.  Somatosensory abnormalities in Chinese patients with painful temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Guangju Yang; Lene Baad-Hansen; Kelun Wang; Kaiyuan Fu; Qiu-Fei Xie; Peter Svensson
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 7.277

8.  Biomarkers in Temporomandibular Disorder and Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Tina L Doshi; Donald R Nixdorf; Claudia M Campbell; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2020-01-23

Review 9.  A comprehensive review on biomarkers associated with painful temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Mayank Shrivastava; Ricardo Battaglino; Liang Ye
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.