| Literature DB >> 24396414 |
Linyou Wang1, Wugen Kang1, Maoheng Zu1, Qingqiao Zhang1, Jianmin Shen1, Liang Wu1, Dongguo Wang1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of using multi-row spiral computed tomography (CT) to scan for pulmonary artery thrombosis and lower limb deep vein thrombosis (LVT) in patients with suspected LVT. A total of 110 patients underwent a contrast-enhanced spiral CT inspection of the pulmonary artery and lower extremity veins. Three-dimensional digital image processing, including multi-planar reconstruction (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering (VR), was also conducted; two groups of experienced radiologists analyzed the CT images to evaluate the postprocessing techniques of these CT images. Seventy-five patients were diagnosed with LVT with or without pulmonary embolism (PE); out of these 75, 34 patients were diagnosed with PE and LVT together and 41 patients were diagnosed with LVT alone. A further 31 patients were diagnosed with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS), and no embolisms were detected in the remaining four patients. With regard to PE, MPR and MIP demonstrated an accuracy of 100%, while MPR also showed images of LVT with an accuracy of 100%. The follow-up results at 12 months were consistent with the CT scan results. The clinical use of 128-slice spiral CT combination scanning in the detection of PE and LVT has significant potential to improve upon the present methods of diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: deep vein thrombosis; diagnosis; digital subtraction angiography; pulmonary embolism; spiral computed tomography
Year: 2013 PMID: 24396414 PMCID: PMC3881061 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Original pulmonary artery cross-sectional image, showing the typical filling defect (arrow) of pulmonary thrombosis.
Credibility of diagnostic results from postprocessed images compared with the results of direct CT in 110 patients.
| Postprocessing positive rate, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| PCTA/CTV | Condition | MPR | MIP | VR | Positive by direct CT, n |
| PCTA | PE+LVT | 34 (100) | 34 (100) | 22 (65) | 34 |
| CTV | LVT | 41 (100) | 25 (61) | 20 (49) | 41 |
| CTV | IVCS | 31 (100) | 31 (100) | 31 (100) | 31 |
Four patients were negative for embolism by direct CT.
CT, computed tomography; PCTA, pulmonary CT angiography; CTV, CT venography; PE, pulmonary embolism; LVT, lower venous thrombosis; IVCS, iliac vein compression syndrome; MPR, multi-planar reconstruction; MIP, maximum intensity projection; VR, volume rendering.
Figure 2Multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) image of a right pulmonary artery. (A) Central pulmonary artery filling defect; (B) lower pulmonary branch filling defect.
Figure 3Volume rendering (VR) image of a left lower limb deep vein, which shows developed venous limitations of thrombosis.