Literature DB >> 12871396

Combined use of clinical assessment and d-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED Study).

D R Anderson1, M J Kovacs, G Kovacs, I Stiell, M Mitchell, V Khoury, J Dryer, J Ward, P S Wells.   

Abstract

Suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common problem facing emergency physicians. Timely diagnostic testing must be performed to accurately identify patients with DVT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a management strategy that combined consideration of clinical pretest probability and a d-dimer test to evaluate patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A prospective cohort study was performed in the emergency departments of four tertiary care institutions involving 1075 patients with suspected DVT. An emergency physician determined the pretest probability for DVT to be low, moderate, or high using an explicit clinical model. A blood sample was taken for d-dimer testing. Subsequent investigations (compression ultrasound, venography) were performed based upon the pretest probability and the d-dimer result. Patients considered at low pretest probability with negative d-dimer had no further diagnostic testing performed. All patients in whom the diagnosis of DVT was excluded by the algorithm did not receive anticoagulant therapy and were followed up for 90 days for the development of proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism. Overall, 195 (18.1%; 95% CI 15.9% to 20.6%) of 1075 patients were confirmed to have proximal DVT. Of the 882 patients who had proximal DVT excluded during the initial evaluation period using the algorithms, four (0.5%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.2%) were subsequently diagnosed with proximal DVT in the follow-up period, including three patients in the low pretest probability group (1.0%; 95% CI 0.2% to 2.1%) who had normal d-dimer and no additional diagnostic testing performed. None of the 882 patients (0%: 95% CI 0% to 0.5%) developed pulmonary embolism in the follow-up period. A diagnostic strategy for the evaluation of patients with suspected DVT based on pretest probability and d-dimer is safe and feasible in the emergency department setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871396     DOI: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00131.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  17 in total

1.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Advances in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Philip S Wells
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Neither baseline tests of molecular hypercoagulability nor D-dimer levels predict deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical patients.

Authors:  M A Crowther; D J Cook; L E Griffith; M Meade; S Hanna; C Rabbat; S M Bates; W Geerts; M Johnston; G Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Scarvelis; Philip S Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Appropriate Use of Venous Imaging and Analysis of the D-Dimer/Clinical Probability Testing Paradigm in the Diagnosis and Location of Deep Venous Thrombosis.

Authors:  Albeir Y Mousa; Mike Broce; David De Wit; Mina Baskharoun; Shadi Abu-Halimah; Michael Yacoub; Mark C Bates
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 6.  Biomarkers of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Huacheng Hou; Zhijuan Ge; Pu Ying; Jin Dai; Dongquan Shi; Zhihong Xu; Dongyang Chen; Qing Jiang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and approach to venous thromboembolism in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  K Mehmet Burgazlı; Mehmet Bilgin; Ethem Kavukçu; M Metin Altay; H Turhan Ozkan; Uğur Coşkun; Hakan Akdere; A Kubilay Ertan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01

8.  Appropriate use of D-dimer testing can minimize over-utilization of venous duplex ultrasound in a contemporary high-volume hospital.

Authors:  Albeir Y Mousa; Mike Broce; Gurpreet Gill; Maher Kali; Michael Yacoub; Ali F AbuRahma
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 1.466

9.  Comparative study of extended versus short term thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasty in Indian population.

Authors:  Velu Nair; Ratheesh Kumar; Bikram Kumar Singh; Ajay Sharma; Gururaj R Joshi; Kamal Pathak
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins in prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative/ICU patients: A comparative study.

Authors:  Arpita Saxena; Apurva Mittal; S K Arya; Deepak Malviya; Uma Srivastava
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.