BACKGROUND: Emotional support has traditionally been conceived as something a breast cancer patient receives. However, this framework may obscure a more complex process, facilitated by the emerging social media environment, which includes the effects of composing and sending messages to others. Accordingly, this study explores the effects of expression and reception of emotional support messages in online groups and the importance of bonding as a mediator influencing the coping strategies of breast cancer patients. METHODS: Data were collected as part of two National Cancer Institute-funded randomized clinical trials. Eligible subjects were within 2 months of diagnosis of primary breast cancer or recurrence. Expression and reception of emotionally supportive messages were tracked and coded for 237 breast cancer patients. Analysis resulted from merging 1) computer-aided content analysis of discussion posts, 2) action log analysis of system use, and 3) longitudinal survey data. RESULTS: As expected, perceived bonding was positively related to all four coping strategies (active coping: β = 0.251, P = .000; positive reframing: β = 0.288, P = .000; planning: β = 0.213, P = .006; humor: β = 0.159, P = .009). More importantly, expression (γ = 0.138, P = .027), but not reception (γ = -0.018, P = .741), of emotional support increases perceived bonding, which in turn mediates the effects on patients' positive coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing importance for scholars to distinguish the effects of expression from reception to understand the processes involved in producing psychosocial benefits. This study shows that emotional support is more than something cancer patients receive; it is part of an active, complex process that can be facilitated by social media.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Emotional support has traditionally been conceived as something a breast cancerpatient receives. However, this framework may obscure a more complex process, facilitated by the emerging social media environment, which includes the effects of composing and sending messages to others. Accordingly, this study explores the effects of expression and reception of emotional support messages in online groups and the importance of bonding as a mediator influencing the coping strategies of breast cancerpatients. METHODS: Data were collected as part of two National Cancer Institute-funded randomized clinical trials. Eligible subjects were within 2 months of diagnosis of primary breast cancer or recurrence. Expression and reception of emotionally supportive messages were tracked and coded for 237 breast cancerpatients. Analysis resulted from merging 1) computer-aided content analysis of discussion posts, 2) action log analysis of system use, and 3) longitudinal survey data. RESULTS: As expected, perceived bonding was positively related to all four coping strategies (active coping: β = 0.251, P = .000; positive reframing: β = 0.288, P = .000; planning: β = 0.213, P = .006; humor: β = 0.159, P = .009). More importantly, expression (γ = 0.138, P = .027), but not reception (γ = -0.018, P = .741), of emotional support increases perceived bonding, which in turn mediates the effects on patients' positive coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing importance for scholars to distinguish the effects of expression from reception to understand the processes involved in producing psychosocial benefits. This study shows that emotional support is more than something cancerpatients receive; it is part of an active, complex process that can be facilitated by social media.
Authors: Kang Namkoong; Dhavan V Shah; Jeong Yeob Han; Sojung Claire Kim; Woohyun Yoo; David Fan; Fiona M McTavish; David H Gustafson Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2010-11-01
Authors: Timothy B Baker; Robert Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; Linda J Roberts; Helene E McDowell; Bret R Shaw; Ron Serlin; Lisa Dillenburg; Christopher M Swoboda; Jeong-Yeob Han; James A Stewart; Cindy L Carmack-Taylor; Andrew Salner; Tanya R Schlam; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Eric S Zhou; Frank J Penedo; Natalie E Bustillo; Catherine Benedict; Mikal Rasheed; Suzanne Lechner; Mark Soloway; Bruce R Kava; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2010 Sep-Oct
Authors: Angela L Falisi; Kara P Wiseman; Anna Gaysynsky; Jennifer K Scheideler; Daniel A Ramin; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Yeela Ben-Naftali; Ron Eromenko; Yoav Yechezkel Pikkel; Ori Samuel Duek; Eran D Bar Meir Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-05-10
Authors: Leah T Tolby; Elisa N Hofmeister; Sophie Fisher; Sabrina Chao; Catherine Benedict; Allison W Kurian; Jonathan S Berek; Lidia Schapira; Oxana G Palesh Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-11-08 Impact factor: 4.062