Literature DB >> 24395445

Factors affecting choice between ureterostomy, ileal conduit and continent reservoir after radical cystectomy: Japanese series.

Toru Sugihara1, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Tetsuya Fujimura, Kiyohide Fushimi, Changhong Yu, Michael W Kattan, Yukio Homma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the disparity of choices between three urinary diversions after radical cystectomy, focusing on patient and institutional factors.
METHODS: We identified urothelial carcinoma patients who received radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomy, ileal conduit or continent reservoir using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2007 to 2012. Data comprised age, sex, comorbidities (converted into the Charlson index), TNM classification (converted into oncological stage), hospitals' academic status, hospital volume, bed volume and geographical region. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses fitted with the proportional odds model were performed to analyze factors affecting urinary diversion choices. For dependent variables, the three diversions were converted into an ordinal variable in order of complexity: cutaneous ureterostomy (reference), ileal conduit and continent reservoir. Geographical variations were also examined by multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 4790 patients (1131 cutaneous ureterostomies [23.6 %], 2970 ileal conduits [62.0 %] and 689 continent reservoirs [14.4 %]) were included. Ordinal logistic regression analyses showed that male sex, lower age, lower Charlson index, early tumor stage, higher hospital volume (≥3.4 cases/year) and larger bed volume (≥450 beds) were significantly associated with the preference of more complex urinary diversion. Significant geographical disparity was also found.
CONCLUSION: Good patient condition and early oncological status, as well as institutional factors, including high hospital volume, large bed volume and specific geographical regions, are independently related to the likelihood of choosing complex diversions. Recognizing this disparity would help reinforce the need for clinical practice uniformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395445     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-013-0655-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine S Panageas; Deborah Schrag; Elyn Riedel; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Health related quality of life assessment after radical cystectomy: comparison of ileal conduit with continent orthotopic neobladder.

Authors:  Sajal C Dutta; Sam C Chang; Christopher S Coffey; Joseph A Smith; Gregory Jack; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Comparisons of perioperative outcomes and costs between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Nobuo Tsuru; Hiroyuki Ihara; Tetsuya Fujimura; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Kazuhiko Ohe; Kiyohide Fushimi; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Urinary diversion in high-risk elderly patients: modified cutaneous ureterostomy or ileal conduit?

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; A Papatsoris; M Chrisofos; A Dellis; C Liakouras; A Skolarikos
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Quality of life in patients having an ileal conduit, continent reservoir or orthotopic neobladder after cystectomy for bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  H Kitamura; N Miyao; M Yanase; N Masumori; M Matsukawa; A Takahashi; N Itoh; T Tsukamoto
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Urinary diversion after cystectomy for bladder cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Staffan Jahnson; Ole Damm; Sverker Hellsten; Sten Holmäng; Fredrik Liedberg; Börje Ljungberg; Per-Uno Malmström; Wiking Månsson; Johan Rosell; Hans Wijkstöm
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-03

9.  Urinary diversion and morbidity after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  John L Gore; Hua-Yin Yu; Claude Setodji; Jan M Hanley; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Health-related quality of life after cystectomy: bladder substitution compared with ileal conduit diversion. A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  B D Bjerre; C Johansen; K Steven
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient and disease-specific factors and their influence on urinary reconstruction choice at a referral center.

Authors:  Adam M Luchey; Gautum Agarwal; Patrick N Espiritu; Jorge L Lockhart; Julio M Pow-Sang; Philippe E Spiess; Wade J Sexton; Michael A Poch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  How to optimally manage elderly bladder cancer patients?

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Marco Moschini; Stephan Korn; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.