| Literature DB >> 24394449 |
Abstract
In spite of much effort over the past 25 years, the life expectancy of the indigenous people remains nearly 20 years behind the non-Aboriginal white population of Australia. These figures compare unfavourably with the improved life expectancy over the past 25 years of other indigenous peoples, such as the New Zealand Maori and the American Indian populations. By 1990-94, the average Australian indigenous all-cause mortality rate was 1.9 times the Maori rate, 2.4 times the US indigenous rate and 3.15 times the all-Australian rate. The persistence of this discrepancy in Australia is obviously a matter of great concern. There is clearly a gap between available knowledge and its application. Some indication of the possibility of reversal of the current situation is given by a recent report of the beneficial impact of the Homelands Movement on Health Outcomes in Central Australian Aborigines. The study compared the prevalence of obesity, hypertension and diabetes in two groups of Aboriginal adults: those living in homelands versus those living in centralized communities in Central Australia. Baseline studies revealed a lower prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and obesity in the homelands group, compared with those living in centralized communities. They were also less likely to die and less likely to be hospitalized for any cause, particularly infections, injury involving alcohol and other injury. Mean age at death was 58 and 48 years for the residents of homelands and centralized communities, respectively. The benefits were most marked in young adults. It is suggested that the homelands communities have a greater degree of control of their own lives than those living in the centralized communities and this may be an important factor in their improved health status. Improvement in indigenous health should be one of the key issues of reconciliation. Priorities include community control of Aboriginal Health Services under the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO), throughout Australia, a greater priority for prevention and public health services (housing, water supply and environmental services) education and economic issues, improved training of indigenous health professionals and increased funding. A national professional organization including NACCHO needs to be established to bridge the big gap between available knowledge and its application for the benefit of the indigenous people of Australia.Entities:
Year: 2000 PMID: 24394449 DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2000.00139.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0964-7058 Impact factor: 1.662