Literature DB >> 2439305

Cortical generators of the CI component of the pattern-onset visual evoked potential.

S R Butler, G A Georgiou, A Glass, R J Hancox, J M Hopper, K R Smith.   

Abstract

Thirteen-channel visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to pattern-onset were recorded with stimuli restricted to individual octants of the peripheral field, to halves and to quadrants of the fovea. The voltage of the CI component was measured in each channel to define its topography for each stimulated sector. The potential fields so obtained were then analysed to find the orientation and location of a dipole that would produce a corresponding pattern of voltages at the scalp. The locations of the computed dipoles are consistent with the hypothesis that CI is generated in striate cortex. The computed locations and orientations are not compatible with alternative arrangements of sources in extrastriate cortex. A significant problem remains. If CI is indeed generated by the striate cortex then the orientation of the dipoles excited by stimulation of the peripheral field indicates that the cortex is surface negative. This leads to the prediction that foveal stimuli will elicit a CI which is negative at posterior electrodes. The experiments reported here confirm that CI is positive with such stimuli, and its source is calculated as a horizontal dipole with its positive pole oriented posterolaterally. Two possible explanations are considered for the reversed polarity of foveal CI: (a) that macropotentials associated with stimulation of the fovea are opposite in polarity from those associated with stimulation of the peripheral field; (b) that the foveal area of the retinotopic map extends into the lateral calcarine fissure with the effect that much of it faces in the reverse direction from the cortex at the pole.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2439305     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(87)90046-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  15 in total

1.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Antígona Martínez; Martin I Sereno; Sabrina Pitzalis; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Correspondence of event-related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing.

Authors:  Deborah Vitacco; Daniel Brandeis; Roberto Pascual-Marqui; Ernst Martin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.

Authors:  G Harding; B Janday; R Armstrong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Antigona Martinez; Mingxiong Huang; Steven A Hillyard; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection.

Authors:  L Anllo-Vento; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

7.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of attention to color: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  L Anllo-Vento; S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Discrepancy between brain magnetic fields elicited by pattern and luminance stimulations in the fovea: adequate stimulus positions and a measure of discrepancy.

Authors:  K Odaka; T Imada; T Mashiko; M Hayashi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Impaired visual cortical plasticity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Idil Cavuş; Robert M G Reinhart; Brian J Roach; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Timothy J Teyler; Wesley C Clapp; Judith M Ford; John H Krystal; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators.

Authors:  M Onofrj; T Fulgente; A Thomas; G Malatesta; M Peresson; T Locatelli; V Martinelli; G Comi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.