David S Geldmacher1, Diana R Kerwin1. 1. Division of Memory Disorders and Behavioral Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Dr Geldmacher) and Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Kerwin).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review evidence-based guidance on the primary care of Alzheimer's disease and clinical research on models of primary care for Alzheimer's disease to present a practical summary for the primary care physician regarding the assessment and management of the disease. DATA SOURCES: References were obtained via search using keywords Alzheimer's disease AND primary care OR collaborative care OR case finding OR caregivers OR guidelines. Articles were limited to English language from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were reviewed and selected on the basis of study quality and pertinence to this topic, covering a broad range of data and opinion across geographical regions and systems of care. The most recent published guidelines from major organizations were included. RESULTS: Practice guidelines contained numerous points of consensus, with most advocating a central role for the primary care physician in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the literature indicated that optimal medical and psychosocial care for people with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers may be best facilitated through collaborative models of care involving the primary care physician working within a wider interdisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based guidelines assign the primary care physician a critical role in the care of people with Alzheimer's disease. Research on models of care suggests the need for an appropriate medical/nonmedical support network to fulfill this role. Given the diversity and breadth of services required and the necessity for close coordination, nationwide implementation of team-based, collaborative care programs may represent the best option for improving care standards for patients with Alzheimer's disease.
OBJECTIVE: To review evidence-based guidance on the primary care of Alzheimer's disease and clinical research on models of primary care for Alzheimer's disease to present a practical summary for the primary care physician regarding the assessment and management of the disease. DATA SOURCES: References were obtained via search using keywords Alzheimer's disease AND primary care OR collaborative care OR case finding OR caregivers OR guidelines. Articles were limited to English language from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were reviewed and selected on the basis of study quality and pertinence to this topic, covering a broad range of data and opinion across geographical regions and systems of care. The most recent published guidelines from major organizations were included. RESULTS: Practice guidelines contained numerous points of consensus, with most advocating a central role for the primary care physician in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the literature indicated that optimal medical and psychosocial care for people with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers may be best facilitated through collaborative models of care involving the primary care physician working within a wider interdisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based guidelines assign the primary care physician a critical role in the care of people with Alzheimer's disease. Research on models of care suggests the need for an appropriate medical/nonmedical support network to fulfill this role. Given the diversity and breadth of services required and the necessity for close coordination, nationwide implementation of team-based, collaborative care programs may represent the best option for improving care standards for patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Authors: R A Mulnard; C W Cotman; C Kawas; C H van Dyck; M Sano; R Doody; E Koss; E Pfeiffer; S Jin; A Gamst; M Grundman; R Thomas; L J Thal Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ladson Hinton; Carol E Franz; Geetha Reddy; Yvette Flores; Richard L Kravitz; Judith C Barker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-09-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Debra L Roter; Cynthia M Boyd; David L Roth; Diane M Echavarria; Jennifer Aufill; Judith B Vick; Laura N Gitlin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Halima Amjad; Donald Carmichael; Andrea M Austin; Chiang-Hua Chang; Julie P W Bynum Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Kristin M Galetta; Kimberly R Chapman; Maritza D Essis; Michael L Alosco; Danielle Gillard; Eric Steinberg; Diane Dixon; Brett Martin; Christine E Chaisson; Neil W Kowall; Yorghos Tripodis; Laura J Balcer; Robert A Stern Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2017 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Danny Scerpella; Kimberly Cockey; Naaz Hussain; Tara Funkhouser; Diane Echavarria; Jennifer Aufill; Amy Guo; Danetta H Sloan; Sydney M Dy; Kelly M Smith Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Michael M Ehrensperger; Kirsten I Taylor; Manfred Berres; Nancy S Foldi; Myriam Dellenbach; Irene Bopp; Gabriel Gold; Armin von Gunten; Daniel Inglin; René Müri; Brigitte Rüegger; Reto W Kressig; Andreas U Monsch Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Yen-Ni Hung; Zbigniew Kadziola; Alan Jm Brnabic; Ju-Fen Yeh; Jong-Ling Fuh; Jen-Ping Hwang; William Montgomery Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2016-08-02
Authors: Jolien Janssen; Paula S Koekkoek; Eric P Moll van Charante; L Jaap Kappelle; Geert Jan Biessels; Guy E H M Rutten Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 2.497