Literature DB >> 24391305

Perception of Pedestrian Signals by Pedestrians with Varying Levels of Vision.

Alan C Scott1, Katherine N Atkins2, Billie Louise Bentzen3, Janet M Barlow4.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the usability of pedestrian signals by persons with varying visual acuities under different conditions of symbol size, crossing length and type of background behind the pedestrian signal. While viewing photographs presented on a computer monitor under unimpaired viewing conditions (approx. 20/20 visual acuity) and under simulated visual impairment (approx. acuities of 20/100 and 20/300), participants attempted to determine the pedestrian phase (Walk or Don't Walk) and to report the number presented by the countdown timer display. Performance on the phase discrimination task by those with simulated 20/300 acuity and with 9 and 12 in. high symbols often resulted in performance which was little better than chance despite a highly controlled environment (i.e., no moving vehicles or environmental distractions) and signals which were subjectively in excellent working condition and of high visibility (i.e., good luminance/contrast, no glare). Reading the countdown display was essentially impossible. Participants with simulated 20/100 acuity were rather successful with regards to phase identification - averaging better than 87% correct under all stimulus conditions - but room for improvement exists as compared to performance in the 20/20 condition. Reading the countdown display was difficult for participants with simulated 20/100 acuity - averaging between 6.5% and 58.5% correct under the various stimulus conditions. The effect of different backgrounds on the usability of the signals, as well as the implications of the findings with regards to signal size and crossing length on the current signals standards, are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24391305      PMCID: PMC3880018          DOI: 10.3141/2299-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transp Res Rec        ISSN: 0361-1981            Impact factor:   1.560


  9 in total

1.  Gaze behavior of the visually impaired during street crossing.

Authors:  Duane R Geruschat; Shirin E Hassan; Kathleen A Turano; Harry A Quigley; Nathan G Congdon
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Recognition distance of pedestrian traffic signals by individuals with low vision.

Authors:  Michael D Williams; Ron Van Houten; Bruce B Blasch
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

3.  Interpreting the multifocal visual evoked potential: the effects of refractive errors, cataracts, and fixation errors.

Authors:  B J Winn; E Shin; J G Odel; V C Greenstein; D C Hood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [Effect of cataracts on contrast pattern reversal stimuli exemplified by the pattern electroretinogram].

Authors:  K Mauck; E Dodt; O E Schnaudigel; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  A comparison of the recognition distance of several types of pedestrial signals with low-vision pedestrians.

Authors:  R Van Houten; B Blasch; J E Malenfant
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

6.  Nonsurgical management of binocular diplopia induced by macular pathology.

Authors:  M Silverberg; E Schuler; S Veronneau-Troutman; K Wald; A Schlossman; N Medow
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-07

7.  Bangerter foils in the treatment of moderate amblyopia.

Authors:  I L Iacobucci; S M Archer; B A Furr; E J Martonyi; M A Del Monte
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  2001

8.  The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Bruce Mehler; Bryan Reimer; Vincent Lammers; Lisa A D'Ambrosio; Joseph F Coughlin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Benita O'Colmain; Caroline C W Klaver; Ronald Klein; Beatriz Muñoz; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Daniel R Saunders; Dylan J Rose; Sidika Katjezovic; Stephanie M Reeves; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.