Literature DB >> 10408454

Nonsurgical management of binocular diplopia induced by macular pathology.

M Silverberg1, E Schuler, S Veronneau-Troutman, K Wald, A Schlossman, N Medow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To treat binocular diplopia secondary to macular pathology.
METHODS: Seven patients underwent evaluation and treatment. All had constant vertical diplopia caused by various maculopathies, including subretinal neovascularization, epiretinal membrane, and central serous retinopathy. Visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to 20/30 in the affected eye. All except 1 patient had a small-angle, comitant hyperdeviation with no muscle paresis. Sensory evaluation demonstrated peripheral fusion and reduced stereoacuity. Neither prism correction nor manipulation of the refractive errors corrected the diplopia. A partially occlusive foil (Bangerter) of density ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 was placed in front of the affected eye to restore stable, single vision.
RESULTS: The Bangerter foil eliminated the diplopia in all patients. Two patients elected not to wear the foil; 1 patient was afraid of becoming dependent, and the other was bothered by the visual blur. Visual acuity in the affected eye was reduced on average by 3 lines. All patients maintained the same level of sensory fusion, with only 2 having reduced stereoacuity. Symptoms returned when the foil was removed or its density was reduced.
CONCLUSION: Low-density Bangerter foils provide an effective, inexpensive, and aesthetically acceptable management for refractory binocular diplopia induced by macular pathology, allowing peripheral fusion to be maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10408454     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.7.900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  8 in total

1.  Perception of Pedestrian Signals by Pedestrians with Varying Levels of Vision.

Authors:  Alan C Scott; Katherine N Atkins; Billie Louise Bentzen; Janet M Barlow
Journal:  Transp Res Rec       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.560

2.  Visual acuity through Bangerter filters in nonamblyopic eyes.

Authors:  Robert P Rutstein; Nicole C Foster; Susan A Cotter; Raymond T Kraker; Dave H Lee; Michele Melia; Graham E Quinn; Susanna M Tamkins; David K Wallace
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Treatment for Central-Peripheral Rivalry-Type Diplopia ("Dragged-Fovea Diplopia Syndrome").

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Lindsay D Klaehn; Andrea M Kramer; Raymond Iezzi; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  New Onset vs Resolution of Central-Peripheral Rivalry-Type Diplopia in Patients Undergoing Epiretinal Membrane Peeling.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Raymond Iezzi; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Causes of Diplopia in Patients With Epiretinal Membranes.

Authors:  Kevin K Veverka; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; William L Brown; Raymond Iezzi; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  The effect of Bangerter filters on optotype acuity, Vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Naomi V Odell; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Wendy E Adams; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 7.  Diplopia as the Complication of Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Maciej Gawęcki; Andrzej Grzybowski
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Grey Filter Contact Lens as Therapeutic Option for Acquired Reduced Binocular Visual Performance.

Authors:  Hans van Vliet; Hinke Marijke Jellema; Carla Nieuwendaal; Ruthie Lapid-Gortzak; Frans Riemslag; Ivanka van der Meulen
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2021-03-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.