Literature DB >> 24391062

Initial evaluation of use of an online partner notification tool for STI, called 'suggest a test': a cross sectional pilot study.

Hannelore M Götz1, Martijn S van Rooijen, Pjer Vriens, Eline Op de Coul, Mariette Hamers, Titia Heijman, Francine van den Heuvel, Rik Koekenbier, A Petra van Leeuwen, Helene A C M Voeten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Partner notification is crucial for sexually transmitted infection (STI) control. We developed Suggestatest.nl (SAT), an internet-based notification system for verified diagnoses of STI/HIV.
METHODS: SAT uses email, short message service, postal letter or a gay dating site to notify sexual contacts. SAT was piloted at the Public Health STI clinics in two major cities in the Netherlands. We evaluated SAT from March to July 2012 by analysing SAT notifications linked with epidemiological data. Determinants for SAT use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 988 index clients receiving a SAT code, overall 139 (14%) notified through SAT, sending 505 notifications (median 2), 84% by text messaging and 15% by email; 88% non-anonymously. Of those intending to use SAT, 23% notified with SAT. Intention to use SAT was the only independent determinant of SAT use in heterosexuals and men who have sex with men. Among the 67 SAT users in Rotterdam, 56% (225/402) of their partners at risk were contactable, and 95% (213/225) of those were notified using SAT. 58% of SAT-notified partners accessed the SAT-website and 20% of them subsequently consulted the STI clinics. STI positivity in partners was lower in those notified by SAT (28% (32/116)) than in those with contact cards (45% (68/152); p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the challenges posed by non-contactable partners are not solved by SAT, it is a valuable novel tool for notification of verified STI diagnoses by index patients and providers. In addition to current standard partner notification practice it suits a small number of clients, especially those reporting more than one partner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Serv Research; Partner Notification; Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24391062     DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  23 in total

1.  Willingness to Distribute HIV Self-Testing Kits to Recent Sex Partners Among HIV-Negative Gay and Bisexual Men and an Examination of Free-Response Data from Young Men Participating in the Nationwide Cohort.

Authors:  Steven A John; Javier López-Rios; Tyrel J Starks; H Jonathon Rendina; Christian Grov
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-06-03

2.  High willingness to use novel HIV and bacterial sexually transmitted infection partner notification, testing, and treatment strategies among gay and bisexual men.

Authors:  Steven A John; Tyrel J Starks; H Jonathon Rendina; Jeffrey T Parsons; Christian Grov
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Jill S Huppert; Gordon L Gillespie; Regina G Taylor; Carolyn K Holland; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Potential impact and acceptability of Internet partner notification for men who have sex with men and transgender women recently diagnosed as having sexually transmitted disease in Lima, Peru.

Authors:  Jesse L Clark; Eddy R Segura; Amaya G Perez-Brumer; Sari L Reisner; Jesus Peinado; Hector J Salvatierra; Jorge Sanchez; Javier R Lama
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Advancing Partner Notification Through Electronic Communication Technology: A Review of Acceptability and Utilization Research.

Authors:  Jennifer Pellowski; Catherine Mathews; Moira O Kalichman; Sarah Dewing; Mark N Lurie; Seth C Kalichman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 6.  Next-Generation Methods for HIV Partner Services: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chad H Hochberg; Kathryn Berringer; John A Schneider
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  HIV Care Prioritization Using Phylogenetic Branch Length.

Authors:  Niema Moshiri; Davey M Smith; Siavash Mirarab
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.771

8.  Changing Patterns of Undiagnosed HIV Infection in the Netherlands: Who Benefits Most from Intensified HIV Test and Treat Policies?

Authors:  Eline L M Op de Coul; Imke Schreuder; Stefano Conti; Ard van Sighem; Maria Xiridou; Maaike G Van Veen; Janneke C M Heijne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Web-Based Respondent Driven Sampling Pilot Targeting Young People at Risk for Chlamydia Trachomatis in Social and Sexual Networks with Testing: A Use Evaluation.

Authors:  Kevin Theunissen; Christian Hoebe; Gerjo Kok; Rik Crutzen; Chakib Kara-Zaïtri; Nanne de Vries; Jan van Bergen; Robert Hamilton; Marianne van der Sande; Nicole Dukers-Muijrers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Acceptance of Home-Based Chlamydia Genital and Anorectal Testing Using Short Message Service (SMS) in Previously Tested Young People and Their Social and Sexual Networks.

Authors:  Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Kevin A T M Theunissen; Petra T Wolffs; Gerjo Kok; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.