OBJECTIVES: Partner notification is crucial for sexually transmitted infection (STI) control. We developed Suggestatest.nl (SAT), an internet-based notification system for verified diagnoses of STI/HIV. METHODS: SAT uses email, short message service, postal letter or a gay dating site to notify sexual contacts. SAT was piloted at the Public Health STI clinics in two major cities in the Netherlands. We evaluated SAT from March to July 2012 by analysing SAT notifications linked with epidemiological data. Determinants for SAT use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 988 index clients receiving a SAT code, overall 139 (14%) notified through SAT, sending 505 notifications (median 2), 84% by text messaging and 15% by email; 88% non-anonymously. Of those intending to use SAT, 23% notified with SAT. Intention to use SAT was the only independent determinant of SAT use in heterosexuals and men who have sex with men. Among the 67 SAT users in Rotterdam, 56% (225/402) of their partners at risk were contactable, and 95% (213/225) of those were notified using SAT. 58% of SAT-notified partners accessed the SAT-website and 20% of them subsequently consulted the STI clinics. STI positivity in partners was lower in those notified by SAT (28% (32/116)) than in those with contact cards (45% (68/152); p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the challenges posed by non-contactable partners are not solved by SAT, it is a valuable novel tool for notification of verified STI diagnoses by index patients and providers. In addition to current standard partner notification practice it suits a small number of clients, especially those reporting more than one partner.
OBJECTIVES: Partner notification is crucial for sexually transmitted infection (STI) control. We developed Suggestatest.nl (SAT), an internet-based notification system for verified diagnoses of STI/HIV. METHODS: SAT uses email, short message service, postal letter or a gay dating site to notify sexual contacts. SAT was piloted at the Public Health STI clinics in two major cities in the Netherlands. We evaluated SAT from March to July 2012 by analysing SAT notifications linked with epidemiological data. Determinants for SAT use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 988 index clients receiving a SAT code, overall 139 (14%) notified through SAT, sending 505 notifications (median 2), 84% by text messaging and 15% by email; 88% non-anonymously. Of those intending to use SAT, 23% notified with SAT. Intention to use SAT was the only independent determinant of SAT use in heterosexuals and men who have sex with men. Among the 67 SAT users in Rotterdam, 56% (225/402) of their partners at risk were contactable, and 95% (213/225) of those were notified using SAT. 58% of SAT-notified partners accessed the SAT-website and 20% of them subsequently consulted the STI clinics. STI positivity in partners was lower in those notified by SAT (28% (32/116)) than in those with contact cards (45% (68/152); p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the challenges posed by non-contactable partners are not solved by SAT, it is a valuable novel tool for notification of verified STI diagnoses by index patients and providers. In addition to current standard partner notification practice it suits a small number of clients, especially those reporting more than one partner.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health Serv Research; Partner Notification; Public Health
Authors: Steven A John; Tyrel J Starks; H Jonathon Rendina; Jeffrey T Parsons; Christian Grov Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Jill S Huppert; Gordon L Gillespie; Regina G Taylor; Carolyn K Holland; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jesse L Clark; Eddy R Segura; Amaya G Perez-Brumer; Sari L Reisner; Jesus Peinado; Hector J Salvatierra; Jorge Sanchez; Javier R Lama Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jennifer Pellowski; Catherine Mathews; Moira O Kalichman; Sarah Dewing; Mark N Lurie; Seth C Kalichman Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2016-05-04
Authors: Eline L M Op de Coul; Imke Schreuder; Stefano Conti; Ard van Sighem; Maria Xiridou; Maaike G Van Veen; Janneke C M Heijne Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kevin Theunissen; Christian Hoebe; Gerjo Kok; Rik Crutzen; Chakib Kara-Zaïtri; Nanne de Vries; Jan van Bergen; Robert Hamilton; Marianne van der Sande; Nicole Dukers-Muijrers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Kevin A T M Theunissen; Petra T Wolffs; Gerjo Kok; Christian J P A Hoebe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240