Literature DB >> 24390812

Using virtual reality to investigate comparative spatial cognitive abilities in chimpanzees and humans.

Francine L Dolins1, Christopher Klimowicz, John Kelley, Charles R Menzel.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy of investigating spatial cognitive abilities across two primate species using virtual reality. In this study, we presented four captive adult chimpanzees and 16 humans (12 children and 4 adults) with simulated environments of increasing complexity and size to compare species' attention to visuo-spatial features during navigation. The specific task required participants to attend to landmarks in navigating along routes in order to localize the goal site. Both species were found to discriminate effectively between positive and negative landmarks. Assessing path efficiency revealed that both species and all age groups used relatively efficient, distance reducing routes during navigation. Compared to the chimpanzees and adult humans however, younger children's performance decreased as maze complexity and size increased. Surprisingly, in the most complex maze category the humans' performance was less accurate compared to one female chimpanzee. These results suggest that the method of using virtual reality to test captive primates, and in particular, chimpanzees, affords significant cross-species investigations of spatial cognitive and developmental comparisons.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimpanzees; humans; landmarks; small- and large-scale environments; spatial cognition; virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24390812      PMCID: PMC4710544          DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  14 in total

1.  Recalling routes around london: activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers.

Authors:  E A Maguire; R S Frackowiak; C D Frith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The ground dominance effect in the perception of 3-D layout.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

3.  Captive cotton-top tamarins' (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) use of landmarks to localize hidden food items.

Authors:  Francine L Dolins
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Taï chimpanzees use botanical skills to discover fruit: what we can learn from their mistakes.

Authors:  Karline R L Janmaat; Simone D Ban; Christophe Boesch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Spatial working memory for clustered and linear configurations of sites in a virtual reality foraging task.

Authors:  Carlo De Lillo; Frances C James
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

Review 6.  Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  B Poucet
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Gibbon travel paths are goal oriented.

Authors:  Norberto Asensio; Warren Y Brockelman; Suchinda Malaivijitnond; Ulrich H Reichard
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Exploration of virtual mazes by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  David A Washburn; Robert S Astur
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  How chimpanzees look at pictures: a comparative eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Fumihiro Kano; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  9 in total

1.  Are parrots naive realists? Kea behave as if the real and virtual worlds are continuous.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Patrick M Wood; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  Technology advancing the study of animal cognition: using virtual reality to present virtually simulated environments to investigate nonhuman primate spatial cognition.

Authors:  Francine L Dolins; Kenneth Schweller; Scott Milne
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.624

3.  The virtual lover: variable and easily guided 3D fish animations as an innovative tool in mate-choice experiments with sailfin mollies-II. Validation.

Authors:  Stefanie Gierszewski; Klaus Müller; Ievgen Smielik; Jan-Marco Hütwohl; Klaus-Dieter Kuhnert; Klaudia Witte
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Technical and conceptual considerations for using animated stimuli in studies of animal behavior.

Authors:  Laura Chouinard-Thuly; Stefanie Gierszewski; Gil G Rosenthal; Simon M Reader; Guillaume Rieucau; Kevin L Woo; Robert Gerlai; Cynthia Tedore; Spencer J Ingley; John R Stowers; Joachim G Frommen; Francine L Dolins; Klaudia Witte
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Contagious yawning in virtual reality is affected by actual, but not simulated, social presence.

Authors:  Andrew C Gallup; Daniil Vasilyev; Nicola Anderson; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Travel linearity and speed of human foragers and chimpanzees during their daily search for food in tropical rainforests.

Authors:  Haneul Jang; Christophe Boesch; Roger Mundry; Simone D Ban; Karline R L Janmaat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) navigate to find hidden fruit in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Matthias Allritz; Josep Call; Ken Schweller; Emma S McEwen; Miguel de Guinea; Karline R L Janmaat; Charles R Menzel; Francine L Dolins
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 14.957

8.  Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Assessment and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Felix Clay; David Howett; James FitzGerald; Paul Fletcher; Dennis Chan; Annabel Price
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  Cross-species neuroscience: closing the explanatory gap.

Authors:  Helen C Barron; Rogier B Mars; David Dupret; Jason P Lerch; Cassandra Sampaio-Baptista
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.