PURPOSE: To investigate the role of biomarkers including serum tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and epidermal growth factor receptor in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, 50 clinical TNM stage II or III patients were analyzed in this prospective study. Pre- and post-NACRT serum levels of biomarkers were assessed using ELISAs. The primary and secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and Mandard regression grade (MRG). RESULTS: The pCR was reported in 5 patients (10.0%). According to the MRG, fifteen patients (30.0%) were divided into group A (Grade I-II), the others in group B (Grade III-V). On univariate analysis, post-NACRT TIMP-1 showed notable significance with pCR (P = 0.092) and significant correlation with MRG group A (P = 0.003). Post-NACRT TIMP-1 ≤ 204.5 ng/mL as cut-off value by ROC curve was associated with more pCR and MRG group A patients (P = 0.016 and 0.002). Interval between NACRT and surgery was related to pCR with approached trend levels of significance (P = 0.05) and to MRG group A significantly on univariate analysis of clinical factors (P = 0.031). On multivariate analysis, post-NACRT TIMP-1 was not significantly related to pCR (P = 0.187), while it was significantly associated with MRG (P = 0.009). Among clinical responders, post-NACRT TIMP-1 level ≤ 204.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with pCR (P = 0.021) and MRG group A (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Post-NACRT serum TIMP-1 could be used as a predictive marker of pathologic response to NACRT in rectal cancer, even in patients with clinical response.
PURPOSE: To investigate the role of biomarkers including serum tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and epidermal growth factor receptor in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, 50 clinical TNM stage II or III patients were analyzed in this prospective study. Pre- and post-NACRT serum levels of biomarkers were assessed using ELISAs. The primary and secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and Mandard regression grade (MRG). RESULTS: The pCR was reported in 5 patients (10.0%). According to the MRG, fifteen patients (30.0%) were divided into group A (Grade I-II), the others in group B (Grade III-V). On univariate analysis, post-NACRTTIMP-1 showed notable significance with pCR (P = 0.092) and significant correlation with MRG group A (P = 0.003). Post-NACRTTIMP-1 ≤ 204.5 ng/mL as cut-off value by ROC curve was associated with more pCR and MRG group A patients (P = 0.016 and 0.002). Interval between NACRT and surgery was related to pCR with approached trend levels of significance (P = 0.05) and to MRG group A significantly on univariate analysis of clinical factors (P = 0.031). On multivariate analysis, post-NACRTTIMP-1 was not significantly related to pCR (P = 0.187), while it was significantly associated with MRG (P = 0.009). Among clinical responders, post-NACRTTIMP-1 level ≤ 204.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with pCR (P = 0.021) and MRG group A (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Post-NACRT serum TIMP-1 could be used as a predictive marker of pathologic response to NACRT in rectal cancer, even in patients with clinical response.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Carlo Capirci; Vincenzo Valentini; Luca Cionini; Antonino De Paoli; Claus Rodel; Robert Glynne-Jones; Claudio Coco; Mario Romano; Giovanna Mantello; Silvia Palazzi; Falchetti Osti Mattia; Maria Luisa Friso; Domenico Genovesi; Cristiana Vidali; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Alberto Buffoli; Marco Lupattelli; Maria Silvia Favretto; Giuseppe La Torre Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: N A Janjan; V S Khoo; J Abbruzzese; R Pazdur; R Dubrow; K R Cleary; P K Allen; P M Lynch; G Glober; R Wolff; T A Rich; J Skibber Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthew F Kalady; Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Luca Stocchi; Daniel P Geisler; David Dietz; Ian C Lavery; Victor W Fazio Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 12.969