Literature DB >> 24389506

Error-related negativities during spelling judgments expose orthographic knowledge.

Lindsay N Harris1, Charles A Perfetti2, Benjamin Rickles3.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we demonstrate that error-related negativities (ERNs) recorded during spelling decisions can expose individual differences in lexical knowledge. The first experiment found that the ERN was elicited during spelling decisions and that its magnitude was correlated with independent measures of subjects' spelling knowledge. In the second experiment, we manipulated the phonology of misspelled stimuli and observed that ERN magnitudes were larger when misspelled words altered the phonology of their correctly spelled counterparts than when they preserved it. Thus, when an error is made in a decision about spelling, the brain processes indexed by the ERN reflect both phonological and orthographic input to the decision process. In both experiments, ERN effect sizes were correlated with assessments of lexical knowledge and reading, including offline spelling ability and spelling-mediated vocabulary knowledge. These results affirm the interdependent nature of orthographic, semantic, and phonological knowledge components while showing that spelling knowledge uniquely influences the ERN during spelling decisions. Finally, the study demonstrates the value of ERNs in exposing individual differences in lexical knowledge.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; Error-monitoring; Error-related negativity; Orthographic representation; Phonological processing; Spelling

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24389506      PMCID: PMC3932664          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  32 in total

1.  Development of neural mechanisms for reading.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Lynn Gareau; D Lynn Flowers; Thomas A Zeffiro; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: a contrast of different training conditions.

Authors:  Rebecca Sandak; W Einar Mencl; Stephen J Frost; Jay G Rueckl; Leonard Katz; Dina L Moore; Stephanie A Mason; Robert K Fulbright; R Todd Constable; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Speaking one's second language under time pressure: an ERP study on verbal self-monitoring in German-Dutch bilinguals.

Authors:  Lesya Y Ganushchak; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-01-20       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  The stability of error-related brain activity with increasing trials.

Authors:  Doreen M Olvet; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia.

Authors:  S E Shaywitz; B A Shaywitz; K R Pugh; R K Fulbright; R T Constable; W E Mencl; D P Shankweiler; A M Liberman; P Skudlarski; J M Fletcher; L Katz; K E Marchione; C Lacadie; C Gatenby; J C Gore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  'Error' potentials in limbic cortex (anterior cingulate area 24) of monkeys during motor learning.

Authors:  H Gemba; K Sasaki; V B Brooks
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-10-08       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Event-related potentials reveal the effects of aging on meaning selection and revision.

Authors:  Aaron M Meyer; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning.

Authors:  Lindsay N Harris; Charles Perfetti
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-12-23

2.  Lexical Stress and Linguistic Predictability Influence Proofreading Behavior.

Authors:  Lindsay N Harris; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.