Literature DB >> 24388478

Comparison of clinically relevant benchmarks and channel sampling methods used to assess manual cleaning compliance for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Michelle J Alfa1, Nancy Olson2, Brenda-Lee Murray2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to recommend sample collection method(s) based on relative soiling in patient-used gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes and determine whether the published benchmarks for protein, bioburden, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) remain relevant for pump-assisted manual cleaning.
METHODS: Patient-used gastroscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes were sampled before and after manual cleaning and assessed for protein, bioburden, and ATP levels. The biopsy port (BP) to distal end (D) sample was collected using 20 mL of sterile reverse-osmosis water. After a 200-mL flush, the umbilical (UM) to BP portion was sampled by flushing 40 mL from the UM to the D.
RESULTS: The BP to D portion of the suction biopsy channel contained 83% of ATP residuals. Despite cleaning with brushing and a flushing pump, 25% of gastroscopes exceeded the ATP benchmark of 200 relative light units (RLU), whereas all duodenoscopes and colonoscopes had <200 RLU after cleaning. The protein and bioburden residuals after pump-assisted cleaning were consistently lower than existing benchmarks.
CONCLUSION: Sampling the suction biopsy channel from BP to D detected the most residuals from patient-used GI endoscopes. The protein and bioburden benchmarks for pump-assisted cleaning can be lowered, but 200 RLU is still adequate for ATP.
Copyright © 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP; Soil distribution; Validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24388478     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  6 in total

Review 1.  Duodenoscope-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Problem.

Authors:  M Rubayat Rahman; Abhilash Perisetti; Roxana Coman; Pardeep Bansal; Rajiv Chhabra; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Superbugs on Duodenoscopes: the Challenge of Cleaning and Disinfection of Reusable Devices.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Gerald McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multicenter comparative study of three "non-destructive" methods of detecting the cleanliness of the da Vinci surgical robotic instrument.

Authors:  Aiqin Chen; Xiumei Zou; Yanhua Tan; Yanhan Chen; Xinru Ye; Shuqin Hao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-12

4.  No relation between adenosine triphosphate after manual cleaning and presence of microorganisms on endoscopes after automated high-level disinfection.

Authors:  Judith A Kwakman; Arjan W Rauwers; Jolanda G Buijs; Woutrinus de Groot; Margreet C Vos; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14

5.  Simulated-use validation of a sponge ATP method for determining the adequacy of manual cleaning of endoscope channels.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Nancy Olson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 6.  A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Authors:  Maarten Heuvelmans; Herman F Wunderink; Henny C van der Mei; Jan F Monkelbaan
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.887

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.