Michael E Newcomb1, Adrienne J Heinz2, Michelle Birkett3, Brian Mustanski3. 1. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: newcomb@northwestern.edu. 2. Center for Healthcare Evaluation, VA Palo Alto Health Care, Menlo Park, California; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 3. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate change across development in two smoking outcomes (smoking status and rate), describe demographic differences in smoking, and longitudinally examine the effects of psychosocial variables on smoking (psychological distress, victimization, and social support) in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. METHODS: Participants were 248 ethnically diverse LGBT youth (ages 16-20 years at baseline) from a longitudinal cohort study with six waves over 3.5 years. Baseline questionnaires included demographic variables and a measure of impulsivity, and longitudinal questionnaires included measures of cigarette smoking (status and average number of cigarettes smoked daily), LGBT-based victimization, psychological distress, and perceived social support. Analyses were conducted with hierarchical linear modeling. RESULTS: Males had higher odds of smoking and smoking rate than females, but females' smoking rate increased more rapidly over time. Psychological distress was associated with higher odds of smoking and smoking rate at the same wave, and it predicted smoking rate at the subsequent wave. LGBT victimization was associated with higher odds of smoking at the same wave and predicted smoking rate at the subsequent wave. Finally, significant other support predicted higher odds of smoking and smoking rate at the subsequent wave, but family support was negatively correlated with smoking rate at the same wave. CONCLUSIONS: There are several viable avenues for the development of smoking prevention interventions for LGBT youth. To optimize the efficacy of prevention strategies, we must consider experiences with victimization, the impact of psychological distress, and optimizing support from families and romantic partners.
PURPOSE: To investigate change across development in two smoking outcomes (smoking status and rate), describe demographic differences in smoking, and longitudinally examine the effects of psychosocial variables on smoking (psychological distress, victimization, and social support) in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. METHODS:Participants were 248 ethnically diverse LGBT youth (ages 16-20 years at baseline) from a longitudinal cohort study with six waves over 3.5 years. Baseline questionnaires included demographic variables and a measure of impulsivity, and longitudinal questionnaires included measures of cigarette smoking (status and average number of cigarettes smoked daily), LGBT-based victimization, psychological distress, and perceived social support. Analyses were conducted with hierarchical linear modeling. RESULTS: Males had higher odds of smoking and smoking rate than females, but females' smoking rate increased more rapidly over time. Psychological distress was associated with higher odds of smoking and smoking rate at the same wave, and it predicted smoking rate at the subsequent wave. LGBT victimization was associated with higher odds of smoking at the same wave and predicted smoking rate at the subsequent wave. Finally, significant other support predicted higher odds of smoking and smoking rate at the subsequent wave, but family support was negatively correlated with smoking rate at the same wave. CONCLUSIONS: There are several viable avenues for the development of smoking prevention interventions for LGBT youth. To optimize the efficacy of prevention strategies, we must consider experiences with victimization, the impact of psychological distress, and optimizing support from families and romantic partners.
Authors: J Zabora; K BrintzenhofeSzoc; P Jacobsen; B Curbow; S Piantadosi; C Hooker; A Owens; L Derogatis Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2001 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat Ziyadeh; Laurie B Fisher; Jessica A Kahn; Graham A Colditz; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-04
Authors: Michael E Newcomb; Michael C LaSala; Alida Bouris; Brian Mustanski; Guillermo Prado; Sheree M Schrager; David M Huebner Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Nathan Grant Smith; Kate Winderman; Brooke King; Ezemenari M Obasi; Lorraine R Reitzel Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Helia Shariati; Heather L Armstrong; Zishan Cui; Nathan J Lachowsky; Julia Zhu; Praney Anand; Eric A Roth; Robert S Hogg; Greg Oudman; Christina Tonella; David M Moore Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jennifer K Felner; Jennifer P Wisdom; Tenneill Williams; Laura Katuska; Sean J Haley; Hee-Jin Jun; Heather L Corliss Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Michael E Newcomb; Daniel T Ryan; George J Greene; Robert Garofalo; Brian Mustanski Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Gregory Phillips Ii; Dylan Felt; David J McCuskey; Rachel Marro; Jacob Broschart; Michael E Newcomb; Sarah W Whitton Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-03-28 Impact factor: 3.913