Literature DB >> 24385573

Complete Genome Sequences of Lactobacillus Phages J-1 and PL-1.

Maria Eugenia Dieterle1, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Daniel Russell, Graham Hatfull, Mariana Piuri.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus phages J-1 and PL-1 were isolated during the 1960s from abnormal fermentations of Yakult. The genomes are almost identical, but PL-1 has a deletion in the genetic switch region and also differs in a gene coding for a putative tail protein.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24385573      PMCID: PMC3879604          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00998-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacillus phage J-1 was originally isolated in 1965 from an abnormal fermentation of Yakult, a Japanese beverage fermented from skim milk and Chlorella extracts, using the Lactobacillus casei Shirota strain as a starter (1). Lactobacillus phage PL-1 was isolated 2 years later when a strain resistant to J-1 was used for manufacturing this beverage. J-1 and PL-1 are serologically related (2). Most of the early work on these phages was done by research groups in Japan, including aspects of phage morphology, phage inactivation, adsorption to cells, DNA injection, and characterization of a lytic enzyme (3–10). Although both phages were isolated in the 1960s and were extensively studied for decades, the genome sequences have not yet been available. Here, we describe the sequencing and genome annotations of phages J-1 and PL-1. The J-1 virion DNA is 40,931 bp and PL-1 is 38,880 bp in length. The G+C% contents are 44.8 and 44.9, respectively. Both phages have unique ends with 10 bases and single-stranded cohesive 3′ extensions (left end, 3′-CGGTCGGCCT). Using 454 sequencing, phage genomic DNAs were sequenced by the Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Genome Center to a depth of 75-fold coverage for phage J-1 and 45-fold coverage for phage PL-1. Raw reads were assembled using Newbler version 1.1. The assemblies were then quality controlled using Consed version 20. For phage J-1, 14 Sanger reads were required to resolve weak areas in the assembly. No Sanger reads were needed for PL-1. The finished sequences were analyzed and annotated in genome editors, including DNAMaster (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu), GBrowse (11), Glimmer (12), GeneMark (13), tRNAscan-SE (14), Aragorn (15), and then were manually curated. Each of the determined open reading frames (ORFs) was functionally annotated using BLASTp (16), CDD (17), and HHpred (18). An analysis of the J-1 genome reveals 63 potential ORFs, with 57 genes on the positive strand and 6 genes on the negative strand. The PL-1 genome contains 59 putative ORFs; 57 are rightward transcribed, while two are read in the opposite direction. Interestingly, the PL-1 and J-1 genomes are almost identical. Compared to J-1, PL-1 has a deletion of 1,900 bp comprising 4 genes that belong to the genetic switch region. PL-1 also differs from J-1 in a gene coding for a putative tail protein (gp16). Since PL-1 was isolated from an abnormal fermentation process using a J-1-resistant strain, gp16 might be involved in host recognition. The genome organization shares the structure observed in other Lactobacillus phages and can be divided into the following modules: packaging, structural proteins, lysis, integration, genetic switch, and replication. An integrase gene (gp24) of the tyrosine recombinase family was found, supporting the temperate origin of these phages. Regarding the differences found among the J-1 and PL-1 genomes, these data might provide new insights on how phages evolve to counteract bacterial resistance mechanisms.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Both genome sequences have been deposited in the GenBank under accession no. KC171646 (J-1) and accession no. KC171647 (PL-1).
  17 in total

1.  ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Dean Laslett; Bjorn Canback
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The generic genome browser: a building block for a model organism system database.

Authors:  Lincoln D Stein; Christopher Mungall; ShengQiang Shu; Michael Caudy; Marco Mangone; Allen Day; Elizabeth Nickerson; Jason E Stajich; Todd W Harris; Adrian Arva; Suzanna Lewis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER.

Authors:  A L Delcher; D Harmon; S Kasif; O White; S L Salzberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Phages of Lactobacillus casei/paracasei: response to environmental factors and interaction with collection and commercial strains.

Authors:  M L Capra; A Quiberoni; J Reinheimer
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Recognition of genes in DNA sequence with ambiguities.

Authors:  M Borodovsky; J McIninch
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Restriction map of the genomic DNA of Lactobacillus casei bacteriophage PL-1 and nucleotide sequence of its cohesive single-stranded ends.

Authors:  Y Nakashima; H Ikeda; Y Kakita; F Miake; K Watanabe
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.891

8.  Cloning, sequence analysis, and expression of Lactobacillus casei phage PL-1 lysis genes.

Authors:  N Kashige; Y Nakashima; F Miake; K Watanabe
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 9.  Bacteriophages of lactobacilli.

Authors:  L Sechaud; P J Cluzel; M Rousseau; A Baumgartner; J P Accolas
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.079

10.  Bacteriophage active against the lactic acid beverage-producing bacterium Lactobacillus casei.

Authors:  K Watanabe; S Takesue; K Jin-Nai; T Yoshikawa
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Genomic Diversity of Phages Infecting Probiotic Strains of Lactobacillus paracasei.

Authors:  Diego J Mercanti; Geneviève M Rousseau; María L Capra; Andrea Quiberoni; Denise M Tremblay; Simon J Labrie; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Exposing the secrets of two well-known Lactobacillus casei phages, J-1 and PL-1, by genomic and structural analysis.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Dieterle; Charles Bowman; Carlos Batthyany; Esteban Lanzarotti; Adrián Turjanski; Graham Hatfull; Mariana Piuri
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.