Literature DB >> 24385330

Better outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients in spite of risk of loss of autonomy for home dialysis.

P Cotovio1, A Rocha1, M J Carvalho1, L Teixeira2, D Mendonça3, A Cabrita1, A Rodrigues1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a leading cause of chronic renal failure, challenging therapy strategies. Patients with diabetes may benefit from peritoneal dialysis (PD) but higher technique failure is feared. Our purpose was to critically evaluate clinical outcomes of this modality in diabetics, in order to find quality improvement strategies in these risk patients.
METHODS: A registry-based study of 432 incident patients, 23% with diabetes, from a university hospital PD program was performed. Traditional methods (Kaplan-Meier, Cox models) and innovative survival analysis, taking competing risks into account, were performed, as well as exploring the trends in cohorts according to the decade of PD start.
RESULTS: In spite of the detrimental effect of diabetes in patient survival compared to non-diabetics (77%, 52% vs 86%, 71%, at 2 and 4 years, respectively; p < 0.0001) the hazard ratio (HR) for death decreased in the more contemporary cohort (0.303, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.150 - 0.614, p < 0.001). It is noteworthy that diabetes was not associated with lower technique survival: 74%, 51% vs 79%, 57%, at 2 and 4 years, respectively (p = not significant (NS)). On multivariate analysis, diabetes was an independent predictor for mortality, but not for technique failure. The hazard ratio (HR) for technique failure also decreased in the more recent cohort (0.566, 95% CI 0.348 - 0.919, p = 0.021). Among reasons for transfer to hemodialysis, proportion of ultrafiltration failure was similar between groups (26% vs 22%, p = NS), but drop-out due to loss of autonomy occurred more in the group with diabetes (23% vs 5%, p = 0.004), mainly due to ischemic stroke. The hospitalization rate was also higher in diabetic patients (1.39 vs 0.84 episodes per patient-year (E/PY), p = 0.004) but the peritonitis rate was not increased (0.53 vs 0.61 E/PY, p = NS).
CONCLUSION: PD was an effective long-term renal replacement therapy in diabetics, without higher rates of technique failure, ultrafiltration failure or peritonitis. Better outcomes were achieved in the contemporary cohort. The menace of autonomy loss due to stroke and higher hospitalization rates enhance the need for assisted PD strategies and better control of comorbidities.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; outcomes; peritoneal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24385330      PMCID: PMC4269503          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  16 in total

Review 1.  Is the declining use of long-term peritoneal dialysis justified by outcome data?

Authors:  Osman Khawar; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Wai Kei Lo; David Johnson; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ploumis S Passadakis; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; P G Blake; S S Fenton
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Reformulating the integrated care concept for the new millennium.

Authors:  David C Mendelssohn; Andreas Pierratos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  French peritoneal dialysis registry (RDPLF): outline and main results.

Authors:  C Verger; J-P Ryckelynck; M Duman; G Veniez; T Lobbedez; E Boulanger; O Moranne
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

Review 6.  Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us?

Authors:  E F Vonesh; J J Snyder; R N Foley; A J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

Review 7.  The fate of older diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis: myths and mysteries and suggestions for further research.

Authors:  Steven Van Laecke; Nic Veys; Francis Verbeke; Raymond Vanholder; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Icodextrin improves metabolic and fluid management in high and high-average transport diabetic patients.

Authors:  Ramón Paniagua; María-de-Jesús Ventura; Marcela Avila-Díaz; Alejandra Cisneros; Marlén Vicenté-Martínez; María-Del-Carmen Furlong; Zuzel García-González; Diana Villanueva; Oscar Orihuela; María-Del-Carmen Prado-Uribe; Guadalupe Alcántara; Dante Amato
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.

Authors:  Sarah Wild; Gojka Roglic; Anders Green; Richard Sicree; Hilary King
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Peritoneal dialysis in patients with diabetes: are the benefits greater than the disadvantages?

Authors:  Satoru Kuriyama
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  1 in total

1.  Technique failure in Korean incident peritoneal dialysis patients: a national population-based study.

Authors:  Shina Lee; Hyunwook Kim; Kyoung Hoon Kim; Hoo Jae Hann; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Seung-Jung Kim; Duk-Hee Kang; Kyu Bok Choi; Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.