Literature DB >> 24384631

Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

Hayrettin Daşkaya1, Haşmet Yazıcı, Sedat Doğan, Ilknur Haberal Can.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 ± 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 ± 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 ± 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 ± 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24384631     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

1.  Reduction of fractured nasal bones; local versus general anaesthesia.

Authors:  J Waldron; D B Mitchell; G Ford
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1989-08

2.  Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation.

Authors:  F G Fedok; R E Ferraro; C P Kingsley; J A Fornadley
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Day-case septal surgery under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia with sedation.

Authors:  V Srinivasan; R B Arasaratnam; G A Jankelowitz
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Unilateral blindness as a complication of nasal septoplasty: case report.

Authors:  Mário Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 0.872

5.  Nasal fracture reduction: local versus general anaesthesia.

Authors:  S Khwaja; A V Pahade; D Luff; M W Green; K M J Green
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty.

Authors:  Rafi Dogan; Selim Erbek; Huseyin H Gonencer; H Seyra Erbek; Cengiz Isbilen; Gulnaz Arslan
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Anaesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Arild Danielsen; Roar Gravningsbråten; Jan Olofsson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Comparison of functional endoscopic sinus surgery under local and general anesthesia.

Authors:  P D Gittelman; J B Jacobs; J Skorina
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia for pediatric otolaryngology procedures.

Authors:  Samuel G Shiley; Kirk Lalwani; Henry A Milczuk
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-06

10.  Death related to nasal surgery: case report with review of therapy-related deaths.

Authors:  Alexander M Tawadros; Joseph A Prahlow
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.921

View more
  2 in total

1.  A good first step for ERAS in otolaryngoiatric field, but it is not enough.

Authors:  Massimiliano Pelli; Luigi Maggi; Monica Rocco
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  The seroprevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus in patients undergoing septoplasty.

Authors:  Ozlem Onerci Celebi; Ela Araz Server; Bahtiyar Hamit; Özgür Yiğit
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.