Literature DB >> 12810468

Intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia for pediatric otolaryngology procedures.

Samuel G Shiley1, Kirk Lalwani, Henry A Milczuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy, safety, and hospital charges for common pediatric otolaryngology procedures with the use of intravenous sedation (IVS) vs general anesthesia (GA).
DESIGN: Retrospective chart study.
SETTING: Hospital-based pediatric otolaryngology practice. PATIENTS: Patients younger than 18 years who underwent tympanostomy tube removal and/or patch myringoplasty with absorbable gelatin sponge, nasal ciliary biopsy, fine-needle aspiration, or other minor procedures between September 1, 1998, and August 31, 2001.
INTERVENTIONS: Procedures performed in 2 settings: outpatient clinic with IVS or operating room with GA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Procedure completion rate, tympanic membrane perforation rate after ear procedures, complications, and hospital charges.
RESULTS: Of 103 procedures, 54 were performed with IVS and 49 with GA. Within the GA group, 32 of 49 patients had additional operations performed and were excluded from analysis of safety and hospital charges. Procedure completion rate was 100% in both groups. The most common procedure was tympanostomy tube removal with patch myringoplasty (IVS, 52 ears; GA, 42 ears). The rate of persistent tympanic membrane perforation was similar between these groups (IVS, 7 [16%] of 45 ears; GA, 5 [15%] of 33; P =.96). All complications were minor and occurred at similar rates (IVS, 10 [19%] of 54 ears; GA, 3 [18%] of 17; P =.94). These events included hypoxia, airway obstruction, and bradycardia, all of which resolved spontaneously or responded to noninvasive interventions such as oxygen or repositioning. Average hospital charges were significantly higher for the GA group (IVS, $356.22; GA, $1516.55; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Various procedures can be performed safely, effectively, and with decreased hospital charges with the use of IVS administered by a pediatric sedation service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12810468     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.129.6.637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  7 in total

1.  Factors associated with reduced radiation exposure, cost, and technical difficulty of inferior vena cava filter placement and retrieval.

Authors:  Matthew Neill; Hearns W Charles; Daniel Pflager; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-01

2.  Age as a Determinant to Select an Anesthesia Method for Tympanostomy Tube Insertion in a Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Dong-Hee Lee; Kihwan Jung; Hojong Kim
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-04-17

3.  Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

Authors:  Hayrettin Daşkaya; Haşmet Yazıcı; Sedat Doğan; Ilknur Haberal Can
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Factors affecting parental satisfaction following pediatric procedural sedation.

Authors:  Vincent K Lew; Kirk Lalwani; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  Effect of anesthesia on evoked auditory responses in pediatric auditory brainstem implant surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Wong; Ruwan Kiringoda; Vivek V Kanumuri; Samuel R Barber; Kevin Franck; Nita Sahani; M Christian Brown; Barbara S Herrmann; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Parental Satisfaction Assessment After Paediatric Procedural Sedation: There Are Still Issues to Address.

Authors:  Kemal Tolga Saraçoğlu; Didem Dal; Ömer Baygın
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 7.  How do You Select an Anesthesia Method Prior to Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for a Child?

Authors:  Dong-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2016-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.