Literature DB >> 24384108

Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.

Paddy M Barrett1, Ravi Komatireddy1, Sharon Haaser1, Sarah Topol1, Judith Sheard1, Jackie Encinas1, Angela J Fought2, Eric J Topol3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrhythmias are remarkably common and routinely go undiagnosed because they are often transient and asymptomatic. Effective diagnosis and treatment can substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiac arrhythmias. The Zio Patch (iRhythm Technologies, Inc, San Francisco, Calif) is a novel, single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG), lightweight, Food and Drug Administration-cleared, continuously recording ambulatory adhesive patch monitor suitable for detecting cardiac arrhythmias in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring.
METHODS: A total of 146 patients referred for evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia underwent simultaneous ambulatory ECG recording with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor and a 14-day adhesive patch monitor. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the detection arrhythmia events over total wear time for both devices. Arrhythmia events were defined as detection of any 1 of 6 arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, pause greater than 3 seconds, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. McNemar's tests were used to compare the matched pairs of data from the Holter and the adhesive patch monitor.
RESULTS: Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected 96 arrhythmia events compared with 61 arrhythmia events by the Holter monitor (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected more events than the Holter monitor. Prolonged duration monitoring for detection of arrhythmia events using single-lead, less-obtrusive, adhesive-patch monitoring platforms could replace conventional Holter monitoring in patients referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Cardiac arrhythmias; Electrocardiographic; Holter monitor; Zio Patch; iRhythm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24384108      PMCID: PMC3882198          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  17 in total

Review 1.  Use of ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring.

Authors:  J P DiMarco; J T Philbrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection.

Authors:  James A Reiffel; Robert Schwarzberg; Maria Murry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  First experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) system for the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmia.

Authors:  Ajay K Joshi; Peter R Kowey; Eric N Prystowsky; David G Benditt; David S Cannom; Craig M Pratt; Anna McNamara; Robert M Sangrigoli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R G Hart
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring.

Authors:  Steven A Rothman; James C Laughlin; Jonathan Seltzer; Jasjit S Walia; Rakesh I Baman; Samer Y Siouffi; Robert M Sangrigoli; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03

6.  A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope.

Authors:  Soori Sivakumaran; Andrew D Krahn; George J Klein; Jane Finan; Raymond Yee; Suzanne Renner; Allan C Skanes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: detection by 7-day electrocardiogram versus implantable cardiac monitors.

Authors:  Martin A Ritter; Simon Kochhäuser; Thomas Duning; Florian Reinke; Christian Pott; Dirk G Dechering; Lars Eckardt; E Bernd Ringelstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Cardiac event recorders yield more diagnoses and are more cost-effective than 48-hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations. A controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  S Kinlay; J W Leitch; A Neil; B L Chapman; D B Hardy; P J Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Usefulness of ambulatory 7-day ECG monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation and flutter after acute stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Denis Jabaudon; Juan Sztajzel; Katia Sievert; Theodor Landis; Roman Sztajzel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous-loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  P J Zimetbaum; K Y Kim; M E Josephson; A L Goldberger; D J Cohen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  93 in total

Review 1.  The emerging field of mobile health.

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Evan D Muse; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Long-Term Continuous Ambulatory ECG Monitors and External Cardiac Loop Recorders for Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-01-31

3.  Optimal configuration of adhesive ECG patches suitable for long-term monitoring of a vectorcardiogram.

Authors:  Muammar M Kabir; Erick A Perez-Alday; Jason Thomas; Golriz Sedaghat; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 4.  Novel wireless devices for cardiac monitoring.

Authors:  Joseph A Walsh; Eric J Topol; Steven R Steinhubl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Toward achieving precision health.

Authors:  Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; T Jessie Ge; Ophir Vermesh; Ryan Spitler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry.

Authors:  Jonathan S Steinberg; Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Peter Aziz; Paweł Balsam; Adrian Baranchuk; Daniel J Cantillon; Polychronis Dilaveris; Sergio J Dubner; Nabil El-Sherif; Jaroslaw Krol; Malgorzata Kurpesa; Maria Teresa La Rovere; Suave S Lobodzinski; Emanuela T Locati; Suneet Mittal; Brian Olshansky; Ewa Piotrowicz; Leslie Saxon; Peter H Stone; Larisa Tereshchenko; Mintu P Turakhia; Gioia Turitto; Neil J Wimmer; Richard L Verrier; Wojciech Zareba; Ryszard Piotrowicz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Yield and consistency of arrhythmia detection with patch electrocardiographic monitoring: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Susan R Heckbert; Thomas R Austin; Paul N Jensen; James S Floyd; Bruce M Psaty; Elsayed Z Soliman; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 9.  Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Furrukh Sana; Eric M Isselbacher; Jagmeet P Singh; E Kevin Heist; Bhupesh Pathik; Antonis A Armoundas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  A Survey of Challenges and Opportunities in Sensing and Analytics for Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disorders.

Authors:  Nathan C Hurley; Erica S Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Roozbeh Jafari; Bobak J Mortazavi
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Healthc       Date:  2020-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.