Literature DB >> 24384084

Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: mobile testing without a sound-treated environment.

De Wet Swanepoel1, Felicity Maclennan-Smith2, James W Hall2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools without a sound-treated environment using an audiometer that incorporates insert earphones covered by circumaural earcups and real-time environmental noise monitoring. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A within-subject repeated measures design was employed to compare air (250 to 8000 Hz) and bone (250 to 4000 Hz) conduction pure-tone thresholds measured in natural school environments with thresholds measured in a sound-treated booth. STUDY SAMPLE: 149 children (54% female) with an average age of 6.9 yr (SD = 0.6; range = 5-8).
RESULTS: Average difference between the booth and natural environment thresholds was 0.0 dB (SD = 3.6) for air conduction and 0.1 dB (SD = 3.1) for bone conduction. Average absolute difference between the booth and natural environment was 2.1 dB (SD = 2.9) for air conduction and 1.6 dB (SD = 2.7) for bone conduction. Almost all air- (96%) and bone-conduction (97%) threshold comparisons between the natural and booth test environments were within 0 to 5 dB. No statistically significant differences between thresholds recorded in the natural and booth environments for air- and bone-conduction audiometry were found (p > 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic air- and bone-conduction audiometry in schools, without a sound-treated room, is possible with sufficient earphone attenuation and real-time monitoring of environmental noise. Audiological diagnosis on-site for school screening may address concerns of false-positive referrals and poor follow-up compliance and allow for direct referral to audiological and/or medical intervention. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24384084     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.10.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry.

Authors:  Deanna K Meinke; Jesse A Norris; Brendan P Flynn; Odile H Clavier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  An audiometric study of the effects of paraspinal stimulation on hearing acuity in human subjects - understanding the Harvey Lillard phenomenon.

Authors:  Mark Demers; Zehra Gajic; Everett Gerretsen; Brian Budgell
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-11-19

Review 3.  How the World's Children Hear: A Narrative Review of School Hearing Screening Programs Globally.

Authors:  Michael Yong; Neelima Panth; Catherine M McMahon; Peter R Thorne; Susan D Emmett
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2020-05-19

Review 4.  Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Elizabeth Convery
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Community-based hearing screening for young children using an mHealth service-delivery model.

Authors:  Shouneez Yousuf Hussein; De Wet Swanepoel; Faheema Mahomed; Leigh Biagio de Jager
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.640

6.  Assessing the efficacy of asynchronous telehealth-based hearing screening and diagnostic services using automated audiometry in a rural South African school.

Authors:  Samantha M Govender; Maurice Mars
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-07-05

7.  Hearing and vision screening for preschool children using mobile technology, South Africa.

Authors:  Susan Eksteen; Stefan Launer; Hannah Kuper; Robert H Eikelboom; Andrew Bastawrous; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 8.  Audiometric Tests without Booths.

Authors:  Alberto Behar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.