Literature DB >> 24382936

A Method for Cemented Bone Interface Examination Without Polymethylmethacrylate Embedment.

Rov D Bloebaum1, H William Higgins2, Karyn E Koller1.   

Abstract

Although effective, the embedment of bone tissue and orthopaedic devices using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has challenges and limitations. To embed using PMMA, specimens must first be fixed in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in ascending grades of ethanol, and then infiltrated and polymerized in polymethylmethacrylate using standard techniques. This process can take more than 22 d for large bone specimens. Additionally, PMMA embedment has been shown to dissolve bone cement, thus enabling the analysis of the bone-cement interfaces. To conserve processing time while preserving the bone-cement interface, a method was developed for processing mineralized bone tissue in preparation for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging that does not require PMMA embedment. This technique does not require the traditional dehydration and PMMA polymerization process. Instead, fresh mineralized cemented bone specimens were serially sectioned and the marrow removed after formalin fixation. The sections were air-dried then desiccated. The sections were then prepared for SEM imaging and examination. This process takes a fraction of the tissue processing time while not compromising the bone-cement integrity. The SEM image quality was shown to be comparative to images obtained with PMMA-embedded bone specimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; embedding; implants; orthopaedics; polymethylmethacrylate

Year:  2006        PMID: 24382936      PMCID: PMC3874938          DOI: 10.1179/his.2006.29.4.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histotechnol        ISSN: 0147-8885            Impact factor:   0.714


  7 in total

1.  Fixation of the tibial components of condylar replacement knee prostheses.

Authors:  P S Walker; C Ranawat; J Insall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Postmortem analysis of consecutively retrieved asymmetric porous-coated tibial components.

Authors:  R D Bloebaum; K N Bachus; J W Jensen; A A Hofmann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Postmortem analysis of bone growth into porous-coated acetabular components.

Authors:  R D Bloebaum; N L Mihalopoulus; J W Jensen; L D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Determining mineral content variations in bone using backscattered electron imaging.

Authors:  R D Bloebaum; J G Skedros; E G Vajda; K N Bachus; B R Constantz
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Progression of human bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants. Rate of bone ingrowth in humans.

Authors:  A A Hofmann; R D Bloebaum; K N Bachus
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-04

6.  A polymethyl methacrylate method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants.

Authors:  J Emmanual; C Hornbeck; R D Bloebaum
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1987-11

7.  Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants.

Authors:  R D Bloebaum; K N Bachus; N G Momberger; A A Hofmann
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1994-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.