Literature DB >> 24382474

A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.

Paresh Kerai1, Pene Wood2, Mary Martin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Australia introduced its version of personal health records in July 2012. Success of the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) relies on acceptance during the early stages. The main aim of this study was to investigate the views of a sample of elderly people in a non-metropolitan region in Australia on the PCEHR, and to assess their acceptance levels of this concept.
METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a non-probability convenience sample of respondents recruited from meetings of Probus, a community club for active business and professional retirees.
RESULTS: Approximately three-quarters of the respondents had computer and Internet access at home. If not accessed at home a computer at a general practitioner's practice was seen as beneficial in accessing the PCEHR. Respondents felt that access to their health record would help them make decisions about their own health and improve their communication with healthcare providers. The majority of respondents were in favour of the PCEHR although some expressed concerns about the security of their PCEHR. There was mixed opinion surrounding the access by health professionals to an individual's PCEHR.
CONCLUSION: This study has revealed important information about views of the PCEHR. While the respondents were generally in favour of the concept, there were still some concerns about the security of the PCEHR suggesting further reassurance may be required. The study also highlighted some measures, in particular provision of General Practitioner computer access points and print-out facilities that may need to be considered during these initial implementation stages in order to improve adoption rates once the technology is fully available.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; Opinion; PCEHR; Personally controlled electronic health records; Public; Quantitative; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24382474     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  6 in total

1.  Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review.

Authors:  Marcy G Antonio; Olga Petrovskaya; Francis Lau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Patients' Online Access to Their Primary Care Electronic Health Records and Linked Online Services: Implications for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Freda Mold; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-12-04

3.  Patient Portal Use and Experience Among Older Adults: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dawn K Sakaguchi-Tang; Alyssa L Bosold; Yong K Choi; Anne M Turner
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2017-10-16

4.  A case study of stakeholder perceptions of patient held records: the Patients Know Best (PKB) solution.

Authors:  Elaine Bidmead; Alison Marshall
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2016-09-21

5.  'I'd like to think you could trust the government, but I don't really think we can': Australian women's attitudes to and experiences of My Health Record.

Authors:  Deborah Lupton
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-04-29

6.  Understanding the Risks and Benefits of a Patient Portal Configured for HIV Care: Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives.

Authors:  Dominic Chu; David Lessard; Moustafa A Laymouna; Kim Engler; Tibor Schuster; Yuanchao Ma; Nadine Kronfli; Jean-Pierre Routy; Tarek Hijal; Karine Lacombe; Nancy Sheehan; Hayette Rougier; Bertrand Lebouché
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.