| Literature DB >> 24381934 |
Abstract
Diagnostic assays for persistent chlamydial infection are much needed to conduct high-quality, large-scale studies investigating the persistent state in vivo, its disease associations and the response to therapy. Yet in most studies the distinction between acute and persistent infection is based on the interpretation of the data obtained by the assays developed to diagnose acute infections or on complex assays available for research only and/or difficult to establish for clinical use. Novel biomarkers for detection of persistent chlamydial infection are urgently needed. Chlamydial whole genome proteome arrays are now available and they can identify chlamydial antigens that are differentially expressed between acute infection and persistent infection. Utilizing these data will lead to the development of novel diagnostic assays. Carefully selected specimens from well-studied patient populations are clearly needed in the process of translating the proteomic data into assays useful for clinical practice. Before such antigens are identified and validated assays become available, we face a challenge of deciding whether the persistent infection truly induced appearance of the proposed marker or do we just base our diagnosis of persistent infection on the presence of the suggested markers. Consequently, we must bear this in mind when interpreting the available data.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia pneumoniae; Chlamydia trachomatis; diagnosis; persistent infection; proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24381934 PMCID: PMC3865385 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Potential biomarkers of persistent human chlamydial infection.
| Chlamydial LPS-containing immune complexes in serum | Technically demanding assay | Acute myocardial infarction | Leinonen et al., | |
| Chronic coronary heart disease | Linnanmäki et al., | |||
| COPD | Von Hertzen et al., | |||
| Stroke | Tarnacka et al., | |||
| Chlamydial LPS in tissues/serum | Technically demanding assay | Atherosclerosis | Kuo et al., | |
| Acute coronary event | Tiirola et al., | |||
| Novel cardiovascular event | Pesonen et al., | |||
| Elevated IgG and IgA antibody | Asthma | Von Hertzen et al., | ||
| Infertility | Sarov et al., | |||
| IgA antibody response to whole bacteria | Interlaboratory variation in MIF | Acute coronary syndrome | Huittinen et al., | |
| Asthma | Sävykoski et al., | |||
| Predictor of treatment response | Hahn et al., | |||
| Increased intima-media thickness in children | Volanen et al., | |||
| IgE antibody response | Immunoblot format | Asthma, severity of asthma | Emre et al., | |
| Chlamydial DNA in mucosal swabs or tissues | Not detected in veins or in the vessel wall in the absence of pathology | Atherosclerosis | Kuo et al., | |
| COPD | Von Hertzen et al., | |||
| Trachoma | Mabey and Solomon, | |||
| Tubal factor infertility | Campbell et al., | |||
| Chlamydial rRNA in tissues | Denotes presence of metabolically active bacteria | Reactive arthritis | Gérard et al., | |
| Trachoma | Burton et al., | |||
| Antibody to GroEL (CPn0134 or CT110) | Autoimmunity manifested as antibody to human Hsp60 contributes to pathogeneses | Asthma | Huittinen et al., | |
| Coronary heart disease | Huittinen et al., | |||
| Trachoma | Skwor et al., | |||
| Subfertility | Karinen et al., | |||
| Infertility | Linhares and Witkin, | |||
| Tubal factor infertility | Tiitinen et al., | |||
| Antibody to CT858 | Trachomatous trichiasis | Skwor et al., | ||
| Seroresponse to a panel consisting of CT110, CT376, CT557, CT443 and absence of response to CT875, CT147 | Some antigens also recognized by sera from acute infection Remains to be confirmed in larger settings | Tubal factor infertility | Budrys et al., | |
| Seroresponse to a panel consisting of antigens CPn0695, CPn0134, CPn0626CPn0702, CPn 449/450, CPn 0854,CPn 0963, CPn1016 | Remains to be confirmed in larger settings | Presence of | Bunk et al., |