Literature DB >> 24381419

A single centre prospective study of liver function tests in post liver transplant patients.

Pradeep Naik1, Venkataraman Sritharan2, Premsagar Bandi1, Mallikarjuna Madhavarapu1.   

Abstract

Liver transplantation means surgical replacement of a diseased liver with a healthy liver. The survival rate used to be 30 % after 1 year and LTx was considered to be the last procedure when all medical or surgical intervention failed. Advances in donor organ preservation, surgical techniques, patient selection, immunosuppressive regimens and treatments for opportunistic infections all have contributed to substantially improve the survival rates. Despite substantial technological, medical and surgical advances, liver transplantation remains a complex procedure that is accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality. The post-operative outcome of each patient varies greatly depending on the patient's pre- operative state, quality of the donated organ and the complexity of the surgery. Complications occur both immediately post transplant and in the long term. Most of the problems can be satisfactorily assessed with a panel of routine LFTs results of which are generated quickly, cheaply on the analyzer which operates 24 h. Liver Function Test identifies the presence of problem but not problem itself. Abnormal results can be meaningful only when used with clinical data, radiological findings. The study includes 75 post LTx patients in three groups adults (non ACR), Pediatrics and ACR. All recipients were on immunosuppressive therapy (tacrolimus, mycophenolate and methylprednisolone), antiviral (ganciclovir), antiprotozoal, antibacterial and antifungal (fluconazole). 5 mL of blood was drawn in plain vacutainer from the post LTx patients every day for 15 days and LFT and GGT was done. Routinely performed liver function tests correlates well with clinical complications involving liver in the transplant patients. Instead of daily testing, may be alternate day analysis of LFT should be sufficient for effective monitoring of patients. The total protein and albumin and the transaminases offer little help in monitoring LFT post LTx. The elevated levels of serum GGT and ALP may be related to chronic immune damage to the transplanted liver. Serum GGT and ALP can be used as early markers for diagnosing biliary complications and can be used to asses adequacy of endoscopic treatment in the group of patients presenting early. Thus, most of the problems can be satisfactorily assed with a panel of routine LFTs generated quickly, cheaply on analyzer which operates 24 h each day. However, it must be emphasized that LFTs may identify the presence of problems but not the problem itself and the abnormal results are meaningful only when correlated with other clinical information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALP; ALT; AST; Acute cellular rejection; GGT; Liver transplant

Year:  2012        PMID: 24381419      PMCID: PMC3547436          DOI: 10.1007/s12291-012-0245-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0970-1915


  26 in total

Review 1.  Advances in liver transplantation. New strategies and current care expand access, enhance survival.

Authors:  Tram T Tran; Nicholas Nissen; F Fred Poordad; Paul Martin
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: a disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database.

Authors:  Mark S Roberts; Derek C Angus; Cindy L Bryce; Zdenek Valenta; Lisa Weissfeld
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Clinical and pathological analysis of acute rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yi Ma; Guo-Dong Wang; Xiao-Shun He; Jun-Liang Li; Xiao-Feng Zhu; Rui-de Hu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) Scientific Committee, Analytical Section: approved recommendation (1985) on IFCC methods for the measurement of catalytic concentration of enzymes. Part 2. IFCC method for aspartate aminotransferase (L-aspartate: 2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, EC 2.6.1.1).

Authors:  H U Bergmeyer; M Hørder; R Rej
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1986-07

5.  Gamma glutamyl transferase as a marker of liver transplant rejection.

Authors:  P E Hickman; S V Lynch; J M Potter; N I Walker; R W Strong; A D Clouston
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1994-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Infection and rejection of primary hepatic transplant in 93 consecutive patients treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  N L Ascher; P G Stock; G L Bumgardner; W D Payne; J S Najarian
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-12

7.  Effect of low central venous pressure and phlebotomy on blood product transfusion requirements during liver transplantations.

Authors:  Luc Massicotte; Serge Lenis; Lynda Thibeault; Marie-Pascale Sassine; Robert F Seal; André Roy
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Ya Li; Xiang Lan; Yong-Gang Wei; Bo Li; Lv-Nan Yan; Tian-Fu Wen; Ji-Chun Zhao; Ming-Qing Xu; Wen-Tao Wang; Jia-Yin Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  The first 100 liver transplantations at the Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  R A Krom; R H Wiesner; S R Rettke; J Ludwig; P A Southorn; P E Hermans; H F Taswell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  A histometric analysis of chronically rejected human liver allografts: insights into the mechanisms of bile duct loss: direct immunologic and ischemic factors.

Authors:  S Oguma; S Belle; T E Starzl; A J Demetris
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  3 in total

1.  The long-term outcomes of deceased-donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: a two-center study in China.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Xiaodong Shi; Guoyue Lv; Xiaodong Sun; Chao Sun; Yanjun Cai; Junqi Niu; Jinglan Jin; Ning Liu; Wanyu Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Association between IRF1 Gene Expression and Liver Enzymes in HBV-infected Liver Transplant Recipients with and without Experience of Rejection.

Authors:  S H Nabavizadeh; S Janfeshan; M H Karimi; A Eidi; R Yaghobi; A Afshari; B Geramizadeh; S A Malek-Hosseini; F Kafilzadeh
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2018-05-01

3.  T-tube vs no T-tube for biliary tract reconstruction in adult orthotopic liver transplantation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Zhou Zhao; Lin-Lan Qiao; Zhao-Qing Du; Jia Zhang; Meng-Zhou Wang; Tao Wang; Wu-Ming Liu; Lin Zhang; Jian Dong; Zheng Wu; Rong-Qian Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.