Literature DB >> 24380042

Positron emission tomography in the follow-up of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients: a systematic review.

Maria Danielsen1, Liselotte Højgaard2, Andreas Kjær2, Barbara Mb Fischer2.   

Abstract

Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) has a high risk of dissemination to regional lymph nodes and visceral organs. Recurrences are most frequently seen within the first 2-3 years after initial treatment, but these patients have a life-long risk of relapse. The prognosis is highly dependent on lymph node involvement and distant metastases, accentuating the importance of close surveillance to identify disease progression at an early stage, and thereby detect recurrences amenable to treatment. Positron emission tomography (PET) has already been proven useful in the staging of CMM, but the utility of PET in follow-up programs for asymptomatic patients in high risk of relapse to detect systemic recurrences has yet to be investigated. We performed a systematic literature search in PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and identified 7 original studies on the diagnostic value of FDG-PET in the follow-up of CMM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated to examine PET's diagnostic value in detecting relapse. The mean sensitivity of PET was 96% and the specificity was 92%. The positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 92% and 95%. Overall, PET has a high diagnostic value and the many advantages of PET indicate utility in the routine follow-up program of CMM. However, the number of prospective studies of high quality is scarce, and as the use of PET and PET/CT is becoming more widespread and the technology is expensive, there is an urgent need for systematic assessment of the diagnostic value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; Melanoma; PET; PET/CT; cancer; diagnostics; follow-up; skin cancer

Year:  2013        PMID: 24380042      PMCID: PMC3867726     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  36 in total

1.  Use of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of silent metastases from malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A Eigtved; A P Andersson; K Dahlstrøm; A Rabøl; M Jensen; S Holm; S S Sørensen; K T Drzewiecki; L Højgaard; L Friberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-01

2.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  PET/MR in oncology: an introduction with focus on MR and future perspectives for hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Svetlana Balyasnikova; Johan Löfgren; Robin de Nijs; Yanna Zamogilnaya; Liselotte Højgaard; Barbara M Fischer
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-15

Review 4.  Update on the current state of melanoma incidence.

Authors:  Emily G Little; Melody J Eide
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Is detection of melanoma metastasis during surveillance in an early phase of development associated with a survival benefit?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Petra G Buettner; Thomas K Eigentler; Andrea Forschner; Friedegund Meier; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The role of positron emission tomography with computed tomography in the follow-up of asymptomatic cutaneous malignant melanoma patients with a high risk of disease recurrence.

Authors:  Rachel Angharad Abbott; Katharine M Acland; Mark Harries; Michael O'Doherty
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Utility of FDG PET/CT and brain MRI in melanoma patients with increased serum S-100B level during follow-up.

Authors:  Tjeerd S Aukema; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Catharina M Korse; Bin B R Kroon; Michel W J M Wouters; Wouter V Vogel; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Omgo E Nieweg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  How few cancer cells can be detected by positron emission tomography? A frequent question addressed by an in vitro study.

Authors:  Barbara M Fischer; Minna W B Olsen; Carsten D Ley; Thomas L Klausen; Jann Mortensen; Liselotte Højgaard; Paul E G Kristjansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Routine use of FDG-PET scans in melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Janne Horn; Jørgen Lock-Andersen; Helle Sjøstrand; Annika Loft
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  [Whole-body staging of malignant melanoma: advantages, limitations and current importance of PET-CT, whole-body MRI and PET-MRI].

Authors:  C Pfannenberg; N Schwenzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  The value of FDG PET/CT for follow-up of patients with melanoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Philip H Vensby; Grethe Schmidt; Andreas Kjær; Barbara M Fischer
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-20

4.  Melanoma patterns of distant relapse: a study of 108 cases from a South Brazilian center.

Authors:  Rodrigo Kraft Rovere; Maria Eduarda Pires de Souza; Danielle Louise da Maia Cidral; Sara Fernanda Hilgert; Yasmine Rodrigues Chamse Ddine; Carlos Efrain Stein; Giuliano Santos Borges; Adma Silva de Lima
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

5.  18 F-FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography has a low positive predictive value for detecting occult recurrence in asymptomatic patients with high-risk Stages IIB, IIC, and IIIA melanoma.

Authors:  Zachary J Jaeger; Gregory A Williams; Ling Chen; Joyce C Mhlanga; Lynn A Cornelius; Ryan C Fields
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Influence of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on therapy management in patients with stage III/IV malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Susann-Cathrin Schüle; Thomas Kurt Eigentler; Claus Garbe; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Seau Tak Cheung; Paul Nathan; Rubeta N Matin; Naomi Chuchu; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan E Bayliss; Abha Gulati; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Manil Subesinghe; Zoe Traill; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-01

8.  Recurrence of Melanoma After Initial Treatment: Diagnostic Performance of FDG PET in Posttreatment Surveillance.

Authors:  Hwan Hee Lee; Jin Chul Paeng; Gi Jeong Cheon; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Keon Wook Kang
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Performance of Long-Term CT and PET/CT Surveillance for Detection of Distant Recurrence in Patients with Resected Stage IIIA-D Melanoma.

Authors:  Robin M Turner; Mbathio Dieng; Nikita Khanna; Mai Nguyen; Jiaxu Zeng; Amanda A G Nijhuis; Omgo E Nieweg; Andrew J Einstein; Louise Emmett; Sarah J Lord; Alexander M Menzies; John F Thompson; Robyn P M Saw; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Canadian Melanoma Conference Recommendations on High-Risk Melanoma Surveillance: A Report from the 14th Annual Canadian Melanoma Conference; Banff, Alberta; 20-22 February 2020.

Authors:  Christina W Lee; J Gregory McKinnon; Noelle Davis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.