Literature DB >> 10654150

Use of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of silent metastases from malignant melanoma.

A Eigtved1, A P Andersson, K Dahlstrøm, A Rabøl, M Jensen, S Holm, S S Sørensen, K T Drzewiecki, L Højgaard, L Friberg.   

Abstract

Correct staging is crucial for the management and prognosis of patients with malignant melanoma. The aim of this prospective study was to compare staging by whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) with staging by conventional methods. Thirty-eight patients with malignant melanoma of clinical stage II (local recurrence, in-transit and regional lymph node metastases) or III (metastases to other sites than in stage II) were included in the study. The results of the PET scans were compared with those obtained by clinical examination, computed tomography, ultrasound, radiography, and liver function tests and histology or clinical follow-up. With 18F-FDG PET we found for all foci a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 56%, compared with 62% and 22%, respectively, when using routine methods. For intra-abdominal foci, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% for both 18F-FDG PET and routine methods. Corresponding figures for pulmonary/intrathoracic foci were 100% and 33%, respectively. Of the patients included in this study, 34% would not have been staged correctly by conventional methods alone. We conclude from this study that 18F-FDG PET is a sensitive method superior to conventional methods for detecting widespread metastases from malignant melanoma. Mutilating surgery of no benefit can thereby be avoided. 18F-FDG PET is useful as a supplement to clinical examination in melanoma staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654150     DOI: 10.1007/pl00006666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  25 in total

1.  Direct comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Felix M Mottaghy; Cord Sunderkötter; Roland Schubert; Petra Wohlfart; Norbert M Blumstein; Bernd Neumaier; Gerhard Glatting; Cueneyt Ozdemir; Andreas K Buck; Karin Scharffetter-Kochanek; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography in the follow-up of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Danielsen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Barbara Mb Fischer
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 3.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  A new animal model for the imaging of melanoma: correlation of FDG PET with clinical outcome, macroscopic aspect and histological classification in Melanoblastoma-bearing Libechov Minipigs.

Authors:  Raphaël Boisgard; Silvia Vincent-Naulleau; Jean-Jacques Leplat; Stephan Bouet; Catherine Le Chalony; Yves Tricaud; Vratislav Horak; Claudine Geffrotin; Gérard Frelat; Bertrand Tavitian
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prediction of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positivity in patients with high-risk primary melanoma.

Authors:  Maria Danielsen; Andreas Kjaer; Max Wu; Lea Martineau; Mehdi Nosrati; Stanley Pl Leong; Richard W Sagebiel; James R Miller; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Routine use of FDG-PET scans in melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Janne Horn; Jørgen Lock-Andersen; Helle Sjøstrand; Annika Loft
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  A prospective analysis of positron emission tomography and conventional imaging for detection of stage IV metastatic melanoma in patients undergoing metastasectomy.

Authors:  Steven E Finkelstein; Jorge A Carrasquillo; John M Hoffman; Barbara Galen; Peter Choyke; Donald E White; Steven A Rosenberg; Richard M Sherry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Melanoma of unknown origin: a case series.

Authors:  J Kelly; H P Redmond
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  A novel aliphatic 18F-labeled probe for PET imaging of melanoma.

Authors:  Hongguang Liu; Shuanglong Liu; Zheng Miao; Han Jiang; Zixin Deng; Xuechuan Hong; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Meta-analysis of the performance of (18)F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Felisa Jiménez-Requena; Roberto C Delgado-Bolton; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Judy Schwimmer; José M Pérez-Vázquez; José L Carreras-Delgado
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.