Literature DB >> 24380018

Mobile Phones: Potential Sources of Nickel and Cobalt Exposure for Metal Allergic Patients.

Marcella Aquino1, Tania Mucci1, Melanie Chong2, Mark Davis Lorton1, Luz Fonacier1.   

Abstract

The use of cellular phones has risen exponentially with over 300 million subscribers. Nickel has been detected in cell phones and reports of contact dermatitis attributable to metals are present in the literature. We determined nickel and cobalt content in popular cell phones in the United States. Adults (>18 years) who owned a flip phone, Blackberry®, or iPhone® were eligible. Seventy-two cell phones were tested using SmartPractice's® commercially available nickel and cobalt spot tests. Test areas included buttons, keypad, speakers, camera, and metal panels. Of the 72 cell phones tested, no iPhones or Droids® tested positive for nickel or cobalt. About 29.4% of Blackberrys [95% confidence interval (CI), 13%-53%] tested positive for nickel; none were positive for cobalt. About 90.5% of flip phones (95% CI, 70%-99%) tested positive for nickel and 52.4% of flip phones (95% CI, 32%-72%) tested positive for cobalt. Our study indicates that nickel and cobalt are present in popular cell phones. Patients with known nickel or cobalt allergy may consider their cellular phones as a potential source of exposure. Further studies are needed to examine whether there is a direct association with metal content in cell phones and the manifestation of metal allergy.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24380018      PMCID: PMC3869443          DOI: 10.1089/ped.2013.0280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol        ISSN: 2151-321X            Impact factor:   1.349


  41 in total

1.  Excessive nickel release from mobile phones--a persistent cause of nickel allergy and dermatitis.

Authors:  Peter Jensen; Jeanne D Johansen; Claus Zachariae; Torkil Menné; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Cellular phone addiction and allergic contact dermatitis to nickel.

Authors:  Cristina Livideanu; Francoise Giordano-Labadie; Carle Paul
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Cell phone dermatitis.

Authors:  J Madhukara; M Sendhil Kumaran; Anil Abraham
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  [Contact dermatitis to nickel related to cellular phone use].

Authors:  Nicolas Kluger; Nadia Raison-Peyron; Bernard Guillot
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Bilateral symmetrical contact dermatitis on the face and outer thighs from the simultaneous use of two mobile phones.

Authors:  Esen Ozkaya
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.845

6.  An unusual case of cell phone dermatitis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Guarneri; Claudio Guarneri; Serafinella Patrizia Cannavò
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Cobalt release from inexpensive jewellery: has the use of cobalt replaced nickel following regulatory intervention?

Authors:  Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen; Morten S Jellesen; Torkil Menné; Carola Lidén; Anneli Julander; Per Møller; Jeanne Duus Johansen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation--evaluation of a public health intervention.

Authors:  Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Detection of nickel sensitivity has increased in North American patch-test patients.

Authors:  Robert L Rietschel; Joseph F Fowler; Erin M Warshaw; Donald Belsito; Vincent A DeLeo; Howard I Maibach; James G Marks; C G Toby Mathias; Melanie Pratt; Denis Sasseville; Frances J Storrs; James S Taylor; Kathryn A Zug
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.845

10.  Prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergy among female patients with dermatitis before and after Danish government regulation: a 23-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Berit Christina Carlsen; Torkil Menné
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  4 in total

1.  Commentary: Environmental chemicals and diabetes: which ones are we missing?

Authors:  Chin-Chi Kuo; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Mobile Phone Dermatitis in Children and Adults: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Clare Richardson; Carsten R Hamann; Dathan Hamann; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.349

3.  Evaluation of nickel and cobalt release from mobile phone devices used in Brazil.

Authors:  Mariana de Figueiredo Silva Hafner; Jessica Chia Sin Chen; Rosana Lazzarini
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 4.  The Safety of Schools Based on Heavy Metal Concentrations in Classrooms' Dust: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mozhgan Moghtaderi; Saeed Hosseini Teshnizi; Tahereh Moghtaderi; Mohammad Ali Ashraf; Habibollah Faraji
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.429

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.