Literature DB >> 24379933

Nano/microparticles and ultrasound contrast agents.

Shu-Guang Zheng1, Hui-Xiong Xu1, Hang-Rong Chen1.   

Abstract

Microbubbles have been used for many years now in clinical practice as contrast agents in ultrasound imaging. Recently, their therapeutic applications have also attracted more attention. However, the short circulation time (minutes) and relatively large size (two to ten micrometers) of currently used commercial microbubbles do not allow effective extravasation into tumor tissue, preventing efficient tumor targeting. Fortunately, more multifunctional and theranostic nanoparticles with some special advantages over the traditional microbubbles have been widely investigated and explored for biomedical applications. The way to synthesize an ideal ultrasound contrast agent based on nanoparticles in order to achieve an expected effect on contrast imaging is a key technique. Currently a number of nanomaterials, including liposomes, polymers, micelles, dendrimers, emulsions, quantum dots, solid nanoparticles etc., have already been applied to pre or clinical trials. Multifunctional and theranostic nanoparticles with some special advantages, such as the tumor-targeted (passive or active), multi-mode contrast agents (magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography or fluorescence), carrier or enhancer of drug delivery, and combined chemo or thermal therapy etc., are rapidly gaining popularity and have shown a promising application in the field of cancer treatment. In this mini review, the trends and the advances of multifunctional and theranostic nanoparticles are briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; Microbubble; Nanomaterial; Nanoparticle; Ultrasound contrast agent

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379933      PMCID: PMC3874503          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i12.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  46 in total

1.  Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Samantha H Luois; Lee B Mullin; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs.

Authors:  Andrew Z Wang; Robert Langer; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  Era of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound.

Authors:  Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-28

4.  Core/shell structured hollow mesoporous nanocapsules: a potential platform for simultaneous cell imaging and anticancer drug delivery.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Hangrong Chen; Deping Zeng; Yunbo Tian; Feng Chen; Jingwei Feng; Jianlin Shi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the biliary system: Potential uses and indications.

Authors:  Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

6.  Hollow silica and silica-boron nano/microparticles for contrast-enhanced ultrasound to detect small tumors.

Authors:  Alexander Liberman; H Paul Martinez; Casey N Ta; Christopher V Barback; Robert F Mattrey; Yuko Kono; Sarah L Blair; William C Trogler; Andrew C Kummel; Zhe Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Doxorubicin as a molecular nanotheranostic agent: effect of doxorubicin encapsulation in micelles or nanoemulsions on the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery and nuclear trafficking.

Authors:  Praveena Mohan; Natalya Rapoport
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Target-specific nanoparticles containing a broad band emissive NIR dye for the sensitive detection and characterization of tumor development.

Authors:  Thomas Behnke; Julia E Mathejczyk; Robert Brehm; Christian Würth; Fernanda Ramos Gomes; Christian Dullin; Joanna Napp; Frauke Alves; Ute Resch-Genger
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  In vitro and in vivo suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma growth by midkine-antisense oligonucleotide-loaded nanoparticles.

Authors:  Li-Cheng Dai; Xing Yao; Xiang Wang; Shu-Qiong Niu; Lin-Fu Zhou; Fang-Fang Fu; Shui-Xin Yang; Jin-Liang Ping
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Hollow/rattle-type mesoporous nanostructures by a structural difference-based selective etching strategy.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Hangrong Chen; Limin Guo; Qianjun He; Feng Chen; Jian Zhou; Jingwei Feng; Jianlin Shi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 15.881

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Spectral Fiedler Field-based Contrast Platform for Imaging of Nanoparticles in Colon Tumor.

Authors:  Chenang Liu; Ankur Kapoor; Joshua VanOsdol; Kalyani Ektate; Zhenyu Kong; Ashish Ranjan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  CD44-Targeting Oxygen Self-Sufficient Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy Against Malignant Melanoma.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Hou; Yingkai Tao; Xinxin Li; Yanyu Pang; Chunsheng Yang; Guan Jiang; Yanqun Liu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-12-22

3.  Low-frequency HIFU induced cancer immunotherapy: tempting challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Guilian Shi; Mingchuan Zhong; Fuli Ye; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.248

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.