Literature DB >> 2437967

Double-blind controlled trial of progesterone substitution in threatened abortion.

I Gerhard, B Gwinner, W Eggert-Kruse, B Runnebaum.   

Abstract

Between 1983 and 1984 a double-blind randomized study with progesterone substitution in threatened abortion was carried out. Fifty-six patients with vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy, the internal cervical os being closed, were referred to the hospital. Twenty-five women (5th and 6th week of gestation) with positive serum concentrations of beta-hCG were admitted to the study without regard to sonogram results. In other 25 women (7th-10th week of pregnancy) and 6 women (greater than or equal to 11th week of pregnancy) fetal heart action and movement could be demonstrated by ultrasound. The patients were prescribed bed rest and vaginal suppositories twice daily, containing either 25 mg progesterone or only polyethylene glycol. The code was not broken until after completion of the study. Serial serum determinations of beta-hCG, estradiol-17 beta (E2), progesterone, and ultrasound were performed. Four patients had to be omitted from final analysis (two tubal pregnancies, one intrauterine infection, one sectio parva). Three of 26 patients progesterone (11%) and five of 26 patients with placebo (19%) had an abortion, which represented no significant difference. Frequency of abortion was increased in women more than 30 years old, in women with previous abortions and after ovulation induction. Progesterone treatment resulted in a significant elevation of serum progesterone concentrations (p less than 0.01), while beta-hCG and E2 were unchanged. The results of this study confirm that pregnancy outcome is favorable in women with bleeding and normal hormone concentrations without hormonal treatment and unfavorable in women with reduced beta-hCG and E2-concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2437967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Res Pregnancy Perinatol        ISSN: 0724-438X


  11 in total

1.  Progesterone to prevent miscarriage in women with early pregnancy bleeding: the PRISM RCT.

Authors:  Arri Coomarasamy; Hoda M Harb; Adam J Devall; Versha Cheed; Tracy E Roberts; Ilias Goranitis; Chidubem B Ogwulu; Helen M Williams; Ioannis D Gallos; Abey Eapen; Jane P Daniels; Amna Ahmed; Ruth Bender-Atik; Kalsang Bhatia; Cecilia Bottomley; Jane Brewin; Meenakshi Choudhary; Fiona Crosfill; Shilpa Deb; W Colin Duncan; Andrew Ewer; Kim Hinshaw; Thomas Holland; Feras Izzat; Jemma Johns; Mary-Ann Lumsden; Padma Manda; Jane E Norman; Natalie Nunes; Caroline E Overton; Kathiuska Kriedt; Siobhan Quenby; Sandhya Rao; Jackie Ross; Anupama Shahid; Martyn Underwood; Nirmala Vaithilingham; Linda Watkins; Catherine Wykes; Andrew W Horne; Davor Jurkovic; Lee J Middleton
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Efficacy of progesterone on threatened miscarriage: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Yuying Yan; Zeping Chen; Ying Yang; Xinkuo Zheng; Meijuan Zou; Gang Cheng; Zhenting Yuan
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology.

Authors:  David M Haas; Taylor J Hathaway; Patrick S Ramsey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-20

4.  Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam J Devall; Argyro Papadopoulou; Marcelina Podesek; David M Haas; Malcolm J Price; Arri Coomarasamy; Ioannis D Gallos
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Aleena M Wojcieszek; Emily Shepherd; Philippa Middleton; Zohra S Lassi; Trish Wilson; Margaret M Murphy; Alexander Ep Heazell; David A Ellwood; Robert M Silver; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

6.  Use of progestagens during early pregnancy.

Authors:  G Dante; V Vaccaro; F Facchinetti
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

Review 7.  A systematic review of dydrogesterone for the treatment of threatened miscarriage.

Authors:  Howard Carp
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology.

Authors:  David M Haas; Taylor J Hathaway; Patrick S Ramsey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-08

9.  Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage.

Authors:  Hayfaa A Wahabi; Amel A Fayed; Samia A Esmaeil; Khawater Hassan Bahkali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 10.  The Influence of Oral Dydrogesterone and Vaginal Progesterone on Threatened Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hee Joong Lee; Tae Chul Park; Jae Hoon Kim; Errol Norwitz; Banghyun Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.