Literature DB >> 24379634

Appropriateness, endoscopic findings and contributive yield of pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Way Seah Lee1, Hafizah Zainuddin1, Christopher C M Boey1, Pei Fan Chai1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the predictability of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guideline with regard to appropriate endoscopic practice in children, positive endoscopic findings and contributive yield in clinical practice.
METHODS: This was a descriptive, retrospective analysis, conducted at the Department of Paediatrics, University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. All children who had esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy from January 2008 to June 2011 were included. An endoscopy was considered appropriate when its indication complied with the NASPGHAN and ASGE guideline. All endoscopic findings were classified as either positive (presence of any endoscopic or histologic abnormality) or negative (no or minor abnormality, normal histology); effecting a positive contributive (a change in therapeutic decisions or prognostic consequences) or non-contributive yield (no therapeutic or prognostic consequences).
RESULTS: Overall, 76% of the 345 procedures (231 EGD alone, 26 colonoscopy alone, 44 combined EGD and colonoscopy) performed in 301 children (median age 7.0 years, range 3 months to 18 years) had a positive endoscopic finding. Based on the NASPGHAN and ASGE guideline, 99.7% of the procedures performed were considered as appropriate. The only inappropriate procedure (0.3%) was in a child who had EGD for assessment of the healing of gastric ulcer following therapy in the absence of any symptoms. The overall positive contributive yield for a change in diagnosis and/or management was 44%. The presence of a positive endoscopic finding was more likely to effect a change in the therapeutic plan than an alteration of the initial diagnosis. A total of 20 (5.8%) adverse events were noted, most were minor and none was fatal.
CONCLUSION: The NASPGHAN and ASGE guideline is more likely to predict a positive endoscopic finding but is less sensitive to effect a change in the initial clinical diagnosis or the subsequent therapeutic plan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Contributive yield; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition; Pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379634      PMCID: PMC3870562          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  18 in total

1.  Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of EGD: a prospective study in a large Asian hospital.

Authors:  Yee-Ming Chan; Khean-Lee Goh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Anesthesia and sedation in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A review.

Authors:  Abdul Q Dar; Zahoor A Shah
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

3.  General considerations and updates in pediatric gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy.

Authors:  Yong Joo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-13

Review 4.  EGD in children with abdominal pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kalpesh Thakkar; Mark A Gilger; Robert J Shulman; Hashem B El Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit.

Authors:  J J Gonvers; B Burnand; F Froehlich; I Pache; J Thorens; M Fried; J Kosecoff; J P Vader; R H Brook
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: an international observational study (EPAGE).

Authors:  Bernard Burnand; Jennifer K Harris; Vincent Wietlisbach; Florian Froehlich; John-Paul Vader; Jean-Jacques Gonvers
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Impact of the Rome II paediatric criteria on the appropriateness of the upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in children.

Authors:  E Miele; E Giannetti; M Martinelli; A Tramontano; L Greco; A Staiano
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a hospital-based study.

Authors:  L Trevisani; S Sartori; G Gilli; C M Chiamenti; P Gaudenzi; V Alvisi; P Pazzi; V Abbasciano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: A prospective 30-day outcomes study.

Authors:  Edmund J Bini; Babak Firoozi; Rosa J Choung; Eyad M Ali; Mohamed Osman; Elizabeth H Weinshel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Prévost Jantchou; Jacques Schirrer; Alain Bocquet
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.839

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Western view of the management of gastroesophageal foreign bodies.

Authors:  Aurora Burgos; Luis Rábago; Paloma Triana
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Procedures in Children: Experience of a Portuguese Center.

Authors:  Sónia Silva; Cláudia Silva; Maria do Céu Espinheira; Isabel Pinto Pais; Eunice Trindade; Jorge Amil Dias
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 3.  Efficiency of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric surgical practice.

Authors:  Abdulkerim Temiz
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-08

4.  Safety and Ethics in Endoscopic Studies in Children: Evidence From the BEECH Study in Zambia.

Authors:  Kanta Chandwe; Beatrice Amadi; Miyoba Chipunza; Masuzyo Zyambo; Paul Kelly
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.165

5.  Paediatric endoscopy by adult gastroenterologists in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: A viable option to increase the access to paediatric endoscopy in low resource countries.

Authors:  Olusegun I Alatise; Henry Chineme Anyabolu; Oludayo Sowande; David Akinola
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Quality indicators in pediatric colonoscopy in a low-volume center: Implications for training.

Authors:  Way-Seah Lee; Chun-Wei Tee; Zhong-Lin Koay; Tat-Seng Wong; Fatimah Zahraq; Hee-Wei Foo; Sik-Yong Ong; Shin-Yee Wong; Ruey-Terng Ng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Diagnostic yield and appropriate indication of upper endoscopy in Jordanian children.

Authors:  Eyad Altamimi; Yousef Odeh; Tuka Al-Quraan; Elmi Mohamed; Naif Rawabdeh
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  The utility and safety of paediatric endoscopy in a district general hospital in Southeast England.

Authors:  Sudeep Shrestha; Rohit Gowda; Hermione Race; Shehriyar Khan; Bim Bhaduri
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.860

9.  Pediatric esophagogastroduodenoscopy in china: indications, diagnostic yield, and factors associated with findings.

Authors:  Shengnan Wang; Xiaoxia Qiu; Jingfang Chen; Hong Mei; Haiyan Yan; Jieyu You; Ying Huang
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.567

10.  Diagnostic yield of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children with chronic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Ulas Emre Akbulut; Hamdi Cihan Emeksiz; Fatma Gulgun Kocak; Ayten Livaoglu
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.318

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.