Literature DB >> 11768262

Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a hospital-based study.

L Trevisani1, S Sartori, G Gilli, C M Chiamenti, P Gaudenzi, V Alvisi, P Pazzi, V Abbasciano.   

Abstract

Aims of this study were to evaluate: (1) whether upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is used appropriately according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines in a hospital setting and (2) whether there is any relationship between appropriateness of UGE and the presence of lesions detected by endoscopy. Indications and endoscopic findings for 734 consecutive UGE performed in 697 inpatients were retrospectively evaluated using ASGE and BSG guidelines to determine appropriateness of referrals. UGE showing endoscopic findings that had direct therapeutic or prognostic consequences were classified as "positive"; the other UGEs were classified as "negative." In all, 46% of UGEs were "positive," 54% "negative," and 61.7% and 23.2% of UGEs were inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG guidelines, respectively (P < 0.001). The probability of finding a positive endoscopy was significantly higher in UGE rated as appropriate than in those rated as inappropriate on the basis of ASGE guidelines (P < 0.001), but not on the basis of BSG guidelines. Endoscopies rated as inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG criteria showed a positive finding in 37.3% and 42.3% of cases, respectively (not significant difference). Multivariate analysis showed that the positive finding is directly related to age (P < 0.05), male gender (P < 0.001), prior UGE (P < 0.05), hematemesis (P < 0.001), and inversely related with upper abdominal pain (P < 0.01) and dyspepsia (P < 0.05). In hospitalized patients, UGE is frequently used for inappropriate indications, according to both ASGE and BSG guidelines. However, the actual clinical usefulness of appropriateness criteria, such as those proposed by ASGE and BSG, is questionable, as their strict observance could lead to missing a large number of significant endoscopic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768262     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012775429096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

1.  Open access endoscopy--a nationwide survey of current practice.

Authors:  M G Bramble
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Underutilization of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  F Froehlich; I Pache; B Burnand; J P Vader; M Fried; J Kosecoff; M Kolodny; R W DuBois; R H Brook; J J Gonvers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit.

Authors:  J J Gonvers; B Burnand; F Froehlich; I Pache; J Thorens; M Fried; J Kosecoff; J P Vader; R H Brook
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Does an open access system properly utilize endoscopic resources?

Authors:  G Zuccaro; K Provencher
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Complications of endoscopy.

Authors:  J Baillie
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Endoscopies: too many and not enough!

Authors:  F Froehlich; B Burnand; J P Vader; J J Gonvers
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Prevalence of open-access gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States.

Authors:  R J Mahajan; J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  R Hart; M Classen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Improving the selection of patients for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  S A Naji; P W Brunt; S Hagen; N A Mowat; I T Russell; T S Sinclair; T M Tang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy--a prospective audit. Steering Group of the Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit Committee.

Authors:  M A Quine; G D Bell; R F McCloy; H B Devlin; A Hopkins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Drivers of Discretionary Utilization: Clinical History Versus Physician Supply.

Authors:  Gregory W Ruhnke; Willard G Manning; David T Rubin; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  A nine-year audit of open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: results and experience of a single centre.

Authors:  Dean Keren; Tova Rainis; Edy Stermer; Alexandra Lavy
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Appropriateness, endoscopic findings and contributive yield of pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Way Seah Lee; Hafizah Zainuddin; Christopher C M Boey; Pei Fan Chai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Aljebreen; Khalid Alswat; Majid A Almadi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  The diagnostic yield of open-access endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Femke Crouwel; M M Meurs-Szojda; M Klemt-Kropp; P Fockens; M E Grasman
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-03-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.