Literature DB >> 24379158

A compilation of field surveys on gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) from contrasting environmental settings in Europe, South America, South Africa and China: separating fads from facts.

Pablo Higueras1, Roberto Oyarzun, Joze Kotnik, José María Esbrí, Alba Martínez-Coronado, Milena Horvat, Miguel Angel López-Berdonces, Willians Llanos, Orlando Vaselli, Barbara Nisi, Nikolay Mashyanov, Vladimir Ryzov, Zdravko Spiric, Nikolay Panichev, Rob McCrindle, Xinbin Feng, Xuewu Fu, Javier Lillo, Jorge Loredo, María Eugenia García, Pura Alfonso, Karla Villegas, Silvia Palacios, Jorge Oyarzún, Hugo Maturana, Felicia Contreras, Melitón Adams, Sergio Ribeiro-Guevara, Luise Felipe Niecenski, Salvatore Giammanco, Jasna Huremović.   

Abstract

Mercury is transported globally in the atmosphere mostly in gaseous elemental form (GEM, [Formula: see text]), but still few worldwide studies taking into account different and contrasted environmental settings are available in a single publication. This work presents and discusses data from Argentina, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Chile, China, Croatia, Finland, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Slovenia and Venezuela. We classified the information in four groups: (1) mining districts where this contaminant poses or has posed a risk for human populations and/or ecosystems; (2) cities, where the concentration of atmospheric mercury could be higher than normal due to the burning of fossil fuels and industrial activities; (3) areas with natural emissions from volcanoes; and (4) pristine areas where no anthropogenic influence was apparent. All the surveys were performed using portable LUMEX RA-915 series atomic absorption spectrometers. The results for cities fall within a low GEM concentration range that rarely exceeds 30 ng m(-3), that is, 6.6 times lower than the restrictive ATSDR threshold (200 ng m(-3)) for chronic exposure to this pollutant. We also observed this behavior in the former mercury mining districts, where few data were above 200 ng m(-3). We noted that high concentrations of GEM are localized phenomena that fade away in short distances. However, this does not imply that they do not pose a risk for those working in close proximity to the source. This is the case of the artisanal gold miners that heat the Au-Hg amalgam to vaporize mercury. In this respect, while GEM can be truly regarded as a hazard, because of possible physical-chemical transformations into other species, it is only under these localized conditions, implying exposure to high GEM concentrations, which it becomes a direct risk for humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379158     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-013-9591-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  41 in total

1.  Mercury speciation and microbial transformations in mine wastes, stream sediments, and surface waters at the Almadén Mining District, Spain.

Authors:  John E Gray; Mark E Hines; Pablo L Higueras; Isaac Adatto; Brenda K Lasorsa
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Dangers of crying wolf over risk of extinctions.

Authors:  Richard J Ladle; Paul Jepson; Miguel B Araújo; Robert J Whittaker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Almadén district (Spain): anatomy of one of the world's largest Hg-contaminated sites.

Authors:  P Higueras; R Oyarzun; J Lillo; J C Sánchez-Hernández; J A Molina; J M Esbrí; S Lorenzo
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Airborne total gaseous mercury and exposure in a Venezuelan mining area.

Authors:  Antonio Garcia-Sanchez; Felicia Contreras; Meliton Adams; Fernando Santos
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China.

Authors:  Xuewu Fu; Xinbin Feng; Jonas Sommar; Shaofeng Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  Lars Lambertsson; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Assessing the contribution of natural sources to regional atmospheric mercury budgets

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Industrial and natural sources of gaseous elemental mercury in the Almadén district (Spain): an updated report on this issue after the ceasing of mining and metallurgical activities in 2003 and major land reclamation works.

Authors:  Pablo Higueras; José María Esbrí; Roberto Oyarzun; Willans Llanos; Alba Martínez-Coronado; Javier Lillo; Miguel Angel López-Berdonces; Eva Maria García-Noguero
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Distribution of gaseous Hg in the Mercury mining district of Mt. Amiata (Central Italy): a geochemical survey prior the reclamation project.

Authors:  Orlando Vaselli; Pablo Higueras; Barbara Nisi; José María Esbrí; Jacopo Cabassi; Alba Martínez-Coronado; Franco Tassi; Daniele Rappuoli
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Formation of methyl mercury by bacteria.

Authors:  M K Hamdy; O R Noyes
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Assessment of air pollution by mercury in South African provinces using lichens Parmelia caperata as bioindicators.

Authors:  Nikolai Panichev; Ntebogeng Mokgalaka; Svetlana Panicheva
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Source and trophic transfer of mercury in plankton from an ultraoligotrophic lacustrine system (Lake Nahuel Huapi, North Patagonia).

Authors:  Andrea Rizzo; Marina Arcagni; Linda Campbell; Neža Koron; Majda Pavlin; María A Arribére; Milena Horvat; Sergio Ribeiro Guevara
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Atmospheric mercury pollution around a chlor-alkali plant in Flix (NE Spain): an integrated analysis.

Authors:  José M Esbrí; Miguel Angel López-Berdonces; Sergio Fernández-Calderón; Pablo Higueras; Sergi Díez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Development of a High-Resolution Laser Absorption Spectroscopy Method with Application to the Determination of Absolute Concentration of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in Air.

Authors:  Abneesh Srivastava; Joseph T Hodges
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Mercury Pollution from Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Myanmar and Other Southeast Asian Countries.

Authors:  Pyae Sone Soe; Win Thiri Kyaw; Koji Arizono; Yasuhiro Ishibashi; Tetsuro Agusa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network.

Authors:  Francesca Sprovieri; Nicola Pirrone; Mariantonia Bencardino; Francesco D'Amore; Francesco Carbone; Sergio Cinnirella; Valentino Mannarino; Matthew Landis; Ralf Ebinghaus; Andreas Weigelt; Ernst-Günther Brunke; Casper Labuschagne; Lynwill Martin; John Munthe; Ingvar Wängberg; Paulo Artaxo; Fernando Morais; Henrique de Melo Jorge Barbosa; Joel Brito; Warren Cairns; Carlo Barbante; María Del Carmen Diéguez; Patricia Elizabeth Garcia; Aurélien Dommergue; Helene Angot; Olivier Magand; Henrik Skov; Milena Horvat; Jože Kotnik; Katie Alana Read; Luis Mendes Neves; Bernd Manfred Gawlik; Fabrizio Sena; Nikolay Mashyanov; Vladimir Obolkin; Dennis Wip; Xin Bin Feng; Hui Zhang; Xuewu Fu; Ramesh Ramachandran; Daniel Cossa; Joël Knoery; Nicolas Marusczak; Michelle Nerentorp; Claus Norstrom
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 6.133

7.  Comparison of Primary Laser Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry Methods for Measuring Mass Concentration of Gaseous Elemental Mercury.

Authors:  Abneesh Srivastava; Stephen E Long; James E Norris; Colleen E Bryan; Jennifer Carney; Joseph T Hodges
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Gaseous Elemental Mercury and Total and Leached Mercury in Building Materials from the Former Hg-Mining Area of Abbadia San Salvatore (Central Italy).

Authors:  Orlando Vaselli; Barbara Nisi; Daniele Rappuoli; Jacopo Cabassi; Franco Tassi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Recent Developments in the Speciation and Determination of Mercury Using Various Analytical Techniques.

Authors:  Lakshmi Narayana Suvarapu; Sung-Ok Baek
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Mercury concentrations and distribution in soil, water, mine waste leachates, and air in and around mercury mines in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA.

Authors:  John E Gray; Peter M Theodorakos; David L Fey; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.609

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.