Literature DB >> 1180551

Formation of methyl mercury by bacteria.

M K Hamdy, O R Noyes.   

Abstract

Twenty-three Hg2+-resistant cultures were isolated from sediment of the Savannah River in Georgia; of these, 14 were gram-negative short rods belonging to the genera Escherichia and Enterobacter, six were gram-positive cocci (three Staphylococcus sp. and three Streptococcus sp.) and three were Bacillus sp. All the Escherichia, Enterobacter, and the Bacillus strain were more resistant to Hg2+ than the strains of staphylococci and streptococci. Adaptation using serial dilutions and concentration gradient agar plate techniques showed that it was possible to select a Hg2+-resistant strain from a parent culture identified as Enterobacter aerogenes. This culture resisted 1,200 mug of Hg2+ per ml of medium and produced methyl mercury from HgCl2, but was unable to convert Hg2+ to volatile elemental mercury (Hg0). Under constant aeration (i.e., submerged culture), slightly more methyl mercury was formed than in the absence of aeration. Production of methyl mercury was cyclic in nature and slightly decreased if DL-homocysteine was present in media, but increased with methylcobalamine. It is concluded that the bacterial production of methyl mercury may be a means of resistance and detoxification against mercurials in which inorganic Hg2+ is converted to organic form and secreted into the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1180551      PMCID: PMC187198          DOI: 10.1128/am.30.3.424-432.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  21 in total

1.  Microbiological factors in the treatment of phenolic wastes.

Authors:  M K HAMDY; E L SHERRER; H H WEISER; W D SHEETS
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1954-05

2.  Biochemical model for the biological methylation of mercury suggested from methylation studies in vivo with Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  L Landner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-04-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Stimulative vaporization of phenylmercuric acetate by mercury-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  K Tonomura; K Maeda; F Futai; T Nakagami; M Yamada
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Identification and determination of organomercurial fungicide residues by thin-layer and gas chromatography.

Authors:  J O Tatton; P J Wagstaffe
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1969-10-28

5.  Synthesis of methyl-mercury compounds by extracts of a methanogenic bacterium.

Authors:  J M Wood; F S Kennedy; C G Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A rapid method for the determination of mercury in urine.

Authors:  G Lindstedt
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  R factors mediate resistance to mercury, nickel, and cobalt.

Authors:  D H Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms.

Authors:  S Jensen; A Jernelöv
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Chemical methylation of inorganic mercury with methylcobalamin, a vitamin B12 analog.

Authors:  N Imura; E Sukegawa; S K Pan; K Nagao; J Y Kim; T Kwan; T Ukita
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  SENSITIVITY OF MIXED POPULATIONS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND ESCHERICHIA COLI TO MERCURIALS.

Authors:  F J STUTZENBERGER; E O BENNETT
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1965-07
View more
  37 in total

1.  Transformations of inorganic mercury by Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S Yannai; I Berdicevsky; L Duek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Mercury analysis of acid- and alkaline-reduced biological samples: identification of meta-cinnabar as the major biotransformed compound in algae.

Authors:  David Kelly; Kenneth Budd; Daniel D Lefebvre
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  Emily J Fleming; E Erin Mack; Peter G Green; Douglas C Nelson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Anaerobic microflora of everglades sediments: effects of nutrients on population profiles and activities.

Authors:  H L Drake; N G Aumen; C Kuhner; C Wagner; A Griesshammer; M Schmittroth
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microorganisms and heavy metal toxicity.

Authors:  G M Gadd; A J Griffiths
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Anaerobic microbial methylation of inorganic tin in estuarine sediment slurries.

Authors:  C C Gilmour; J H Tuttle; J C Means
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Measurement of mercury methylation in lake water and sediment samples.

Authors:  A Furutani; J W Rudd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Biotransformation of Hg(II) by cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Daniel D Lefebvre; David Kelly; Kenneth Budd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Mercury resistance and R plasmids in Escherichia coli isolated from clinical lesions in Japan.

Authors:  H Nakahara; T Ishikawa; Y Sarai; I Kondo; H Kozukue
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Role of plasmids in mercury transformation by bacteria isolated from the aquatic environment.

Authors:  B H Olson; T Barkay; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.