Literature DB >> 24379152

Intercommunication between prefrontal and posterior brain regions for protecting visual working memory from distractor interference.

Anna M Liesefeld1, Heinrich R Liesefeld, Hubert D Zimmer.   

Abstract

Because visual working memory has a very restricted capacity, good filtering mechanisms are essential for its successful functioning. A neuronal signal emitted by the prefrontal cortex is considered to be an important contributor to filtering. Proof of the functional significance of this signal during normal cognitive functioning is, however, still missing. Furthermore, research has so far neglected that the prefrontal cortex must receive input from posterior brain areas that report the necessity to filter. From human electroencephalograms, we extracted several event-related components that reflect the different subprocesses of filtering. On the basis of their timing and a clear pattern of correlations, we reason that filtering might consist of a causal chain of events that involve prefrontal and posterior cortex regions: After distractors are detected in posterior regions, a prefrontal mechanism is activated, which in turn prevents subsequent unnecessary parietal storage of distractor information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive control; delay activity; electroencephalography; electrophysiology; evoked potentials; fronto-parietal network; neural networks; prefrontal cortex; visual attention; visual memory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379152     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613501170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  15 in total

1.  Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Re-evaluating the relationships among filtering activity, unnecessary storage, and visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Michael A Busseri
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Irida Mance; Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A daytime nap enhances visual working memory performance and alters event-related delay activity.

Authors:  Kevin J MacDonald; Holly A Lockhart; Alex C Storace; Stephen M Emrich; Kimberly A Cote
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  A two-phase model of resource allocation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Chaoxiong Ye; Zhonghua Hu; Hong Li; Tapani Ristaniemi; Qiang Liu; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Halely Balaban; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Estimating the Timing of Cognitive Operations With MEG/EEG Latency Measures: A Primer, a Brief Tutorial, and an Implementation of Various Methods.

Authors:  Heinrich René Liesefeld
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Altered inhibitory control and increased sensitivity to cross-modal interference in tinnitus during auditory and visual tasks.

Authors:  Rodrigo Araneda; Anne G De Volder; Naïma Deggouj; Laurent Renier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.