Literature DB >> 24378496

Exposed medical staff: challenges, available tools, and opportunities for improvement.

Lawrence T Dauer1.   

Abstract

Medical staff doses have increased over the past decade, as there is an increasing need for the benefits and use of radiation in medicine. While current average medical staff doses are well within limits, some doses to individuals could exceed 20 mSv y deep dose equivalent or lens dose equivalent (if unprotected), and there is the potential for some workers to exceed 500 mSv y shallow dose equivalent without careful assessment and protection. Nuclear medicine radiochemistry and patient dose preparation present challenging opportunities for improved dose control. In addition, fluoroscopically guided intervention procedures continue to represent an important area for careful protection implementation. Optimization of radiation protection in the medical setting should include tried and true principles of justification, optimization, and limitation with emphasis on training, credentialing, planning, and quality management. As newer and developing uses of radiation in medicine are tested and implemented, it is important to consider effective dosimetric monitoring, lens of eye doses, extremity doses, novel uses, and novel radionuclide characteristics. An ongoing assessment of current and future patterns of use for radiation in medicine is an essential activity to assist in prioritizing limited resources for staff protection. Introduction of Exposed Medical Staff (Video 1:27, http://links.lww.com/HP/A20).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24378496     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers.

Authors:  John Boice; Lawrence T Dauer; Kenneth R Kase; Fred A Mettler; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Commentary Number 26: Impact of Revised Guidance on Radiation Protection for the Lens of the Eye.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Nobuyuki Hamada; Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  Radiological protection for pregnant women at a large academic medical Cancer Center.

Authors:  Bae Chu; Daniel Miodownik; Matthew J Williamson; Yiming Gao; Jean St Germain; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Cohort profile - MSK radiation workers: a feasibility study to establish a deceased worker sub-cohort as part of a multicenter medical radiation worker component in the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Meghan Woods; Daniel Miodownik; Brian Serencsits; Brian Quinn; Michael Bellamy; Craig Yoder; Xiaolin Liang; John D Boice; Jonine Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Comparison of day 3 and day 5 thyroglobulin results after thyrogen injection in differentiated thyroid cancer patients.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Esra Hatipoglu; Burcak Gunes; Sertac Asa; Lebriz Uslu; Kerim Sönmezoğlu
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.565

6.  Effects of Occupational Radiation Exposure on Job Stress and Job Burnout of Medical Staff in Xinjiang, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Yaoqin Lu; Xianting Yong; Jianwen Li; Jiwen Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-12-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.