Literature DB >> 24378246

Combination of flow reversal and distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting.

Kei Harada1, Kousuke Kakumoto2, Jun Morioka3, Tarou Saito4, Kouzou Fukuyama2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with distal filter protection allows continuous cerebral perfusion, although it is associated with a greater risk of cerebral ischemic complications than other protection systems. To reduce cerebral ischemic complications, CAS was performed under combined cerebral protection using both flow reversal (FR) and a distal filter.
METHODS: Fifty-six stenoses of 52 patients were treated with CAS using the combined protection of FR and a distal filter, with intermittent occlusion of both the common carotid artery (CCA) and the external carotid artery. The blood flow was reversed into the guiding catheter to the central venous system via an external filter, which collected the debris. Clinical outcomes, the rates of capturing visible debris, and new ischemic signals on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) were evaluated.
RESULTS: The overall technical success rate was 92.9% (52/56). Successful stent deployment was achieved in 100% (56/56) of the cases. No procedural-related emboli causing a neurologic deficit were observed. In 38.5% (20/52) of the cases, visible debris were captured by only the external filter, and in 17.3% (9/52), visible debris were captured by both external and distal filters. In no case was visible debris noted in only the distal filter. New ischemic signals on DWI-MRI were detected in 9.6% (5/52). The 30-day myocardial infarction, stroke, and death rates were 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The additional use of a distal filter captures emboli in 17.3% of cases, and because the occlusion is only intermittent, the procedure is potentially applicable even in those who cannot tolerate prolonged balloon occlusion of the CCA.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24378246     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of antegrade flow at internal carotid artery during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection.

Authors:  Kei Harada; Kosuke Kakumoto; Shogo Oshikata; Kozo Fukuyama
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Precautions for using a Filter Protection Device with a Flow Reversal Method during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report on In-Filter Thrombus.

Authors:  Tomotaka Ohshima; Shigeru Miyachi; Naoki Matsuo; Reo Kawaguchi; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

3.  Safety of carotid artery stenting for elderly patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Takahito Okazaki; Jumpei Oshita; Masashi Kuwabara; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience.

Authors:  Yosuke Kajihara; Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Yoshihiro Kiura; Kazutoshi Mukada; Takahiro Chaki; Shiro Kajihara; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Transcervical access, reversal of flow and mesh-covered stents: New options in the armamentarium of carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Frank J Veith
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-26

6.  Safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: Study protocol of a prospective multicenter single-arm clinical trial.

Authors:  Huan Liu; Tianxiao Li; Zhaoshuo Li; Liangfu Zhu; Yingkun He
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2020-03-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.