| Literature DB >> 24377436 |
Colin N Ramsay, Adam P Wagner, Chris Robertson, Huw V Smith, Kevin G J Pollock.
Abstract
Continuous exposure to low levels of Cryptosporidium oocysts is associated with production of protective antibodies. We investigated prevalence of antibodies against the 27-kDa Cryptosporidium oocyst antigen among blood donors in 2 areas of Scotland supplied by drinking water from different sources with different filtration standards: Glasgow (not filtered) and Dundee (filtered). During 2006-2009, seroprevalence and risk factor data were collected; this period includes 2007, when enhanced filtration was introduced to the Glasgow supply. A serologic response to the 27-kDa antigen was found for ≈75% of donors in the 2 cohorts combined. Mixed regression modeling indicated a 32% step-change reduction in seroprevalence of antibodies against Cryptosporidium among persons in the Glasgow area, which was associated with introduction of enhanced filtration treatment. Removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts from water reduces the risk for waterborne exposure, sporadic infections, and outbreaks. Paradoxically, however, oocyst removal might lower immunity and increase the risk for infection from other sources.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; Scotland; bacteria; cryptosporidiosis; drinking water; filtration; fresh water; seroepidemiology
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24377436 PMCID: PMC3884704 DOI: 10.3201/eid2001.120386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Participants in study of antibodies against Cryptosporidium in drinking water, Scotland, UK, 2006–2008
| Participants | Study period | |||
| 1 (2006 Apr–Jul) | 2 (2006 Aug–Oct) | 3 (2008 Apr–Jul) | 4 (2008 Aug–Oct) | |
| Previous participants* | 1,051 | 750 | 608 | 911 |
| New recruits | 0 | 133 | 253 | 0 |
| Total | 1,051 | 883 | 861 | 911 |
| By city | ||||
| Glasgow | 791 | 671 | 638 | 698 |
| Dundee | 260 | 212 | 223 | 213 |
*Donated blood at least 1 time since period 1.
Concentration of oocysts in drinking water before and after September 2007 installation of filtration system in Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| Location, period | Concentration of oocysts/10 L | Reduction, % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Final | ||
| Dundee | |||
| Before | 0.000850 | 0.000439 | 48 |
| After | 0.001979 | 0.000115 | 94 |
| Glasgow | |||
| Before | 0.004219 | 0.001320 | 69 |
| After | 0.000855 | 0.000000 | 100 |
Demographic characteristics of participants in study of antibodies against Cryptosporidium in drinking water, Scotland, UK, 2006–2008*
| Characteristic | Location, water filtration status | |||
| Dundee | Glasgow | |||
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Mean age, y | 42.3 (40.8–43.9) | 45.5 (43.8–47.2) | 38.8 (37.9–39.6) | 42.7 (41.7–43.6) |
| Female, % | 44.2 (38.3–50.3) | 45.2 (38.7–52) | 47.1 (43.9–50.3) | 43.1 (39.6–46.8) |
| Swam in past 12 mo, % | 64.6 (58.6–70.2)† | 48.3 (41.6–55.1)‡ | 58.4 (55.1–61.5)† | 50.1 (46.4–53.7)‡ |
| Have with <5 children, % | 8.5 (5.7–12.5)† | 9.5 (6.2–14.3)‡ | 7.4 (5.9–9.2)† | 7.5 (5.8–9.7)‡ |
| Have pets, % | 43.8 (37.9–49.9)† | 38.8 (32.4–45.5)‡ | 32.3 (29.3–35.4)† | 30.8 (27.5–34.3)‡ |
| Drink unboiled water, % | 96.2 (93.1–97.9)† | 95.2 (91.4–97.4)‡ | 89.2 (87.1–91.1)† | 88.4 (85.8–90.5)‡ |
| Drink bottled water, % | 69.2 (63.4–74.5)1 | 63.2 (56.4–69.4) ‡ | 77.4 (74.6–80)† | 73.7 (70.3–76.8)‡ |
*Before, before filtration in Glasgow (periods 1 and 2); after, after filtration in Glasgow (periods 3 and 4). †Percentage of persons who answered “yes” to the question at period 1, period 2, or both. ‡Percentage of persons who answered “yes” to the question at period 3, period 4, or both.
FigureMean percentage positive response (PPR) (IgG) to the 27-kDa antigen of Cryptosporidium oocysts among blood donors in Glasgow and Dundee, Scotland, 2006–2008. This graph represents the (model estimate) geometric mean PPR for an average participant followed up for the 4 time periods. The plot does not represent the proportion of participants for whom serologic response to the 27-kDa antigen was positive.
The coefficients and significance of the terms used in the second linear mixed effects model fitted to the log of the percentage positive response*
| Model element | Coefficient | Coefficient exponentiated (95% CI) | % Difference
(95% CI) | |
| Value (95% CI) | p alue | |||
| Intercept | 2.79 (2.61 to 2.98) | 0.0000 | 16.32 (13.57 to 19.63) | NA |
| City† | 0.09 (0.02 to 0.15) | 0.0077 | 1.09 (1.02 to 1.17) | 19 (5 to 33) |
| Pre/post filtration periods‡ | 0.29 (0.24 to 0.33) | 0.0000 | 1.33 (1.27 to 1.4) | 66 (54 to 79) |
| Period 2 vs. period 1§ | 0.16 (0.1 to 0.22) | 0.0000 | 1.17 (1.1 to 1.25) | 34 (20 to 49) |
| Period 4 vs. period 3¶ | 0.12 (0.06 to 0.19) | 0.0004 | 1.13 (1.06 to 1.21) | 26 (11 to 42) |
| Pre/postfiltration, Glasgow vs. Dundee# | −0.17 (−0.22 to −0.12) | 0.0000 | 0.84 (0.8 to 0.88) | −32 (−40 to −23) |
| Period 2 vs. period 1, Glasgow vs. Dundee** | 0.06 (0 to 0.12) | 0.0690 | 1.06 (1 to 1.13) | 12 (−1 to −26) |
| Period 4 vs. period 3, Glasgow vs. Dundee†† | 0.07 (0 to 0.14) | 0.0475 | 1.07 (1 to 1.15) | 14 (0 to 29) |
| Minimum donor age‡‡ | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.02) | 0.0000 | 1.02 (1.01 to 1.02) | NA |
*Calculated for study of antibodies against Cryptosporidium spp. in drinking water, Scotland, 2006–2009. NA, not applicable. †Negative value implies fewer/lower serologic responses in Glasgow than in Dundee, averaged over the 4 periods. ‡Positive value implies more/higher responses in periods 3 and 4 compared with periods 1 and 2, averaged over the periods and cities. Periods 3 and 4 are post filtration in Glasgow. §Positive value implies more/higher responses during period 2 compared with period 1, averaged over the cities. ¶Positive value implies more/higher responses during period 4 compared with period 3 averaged over the cities. #Negative value implies fewer/lower responses after filtration (period 3 and 4) at Glasgow than at Dundee. This is a comparison of the change in response from periods 1 and 2 with periods 3 and 4 in Glasgow with the same change in Dundee. **Positive value implies more/higher change in responses at Glasgow than at Dundee in period 2 compared with period 1. ††Positive value implies more/higher change in responses at Glasgow than at Dundee in period 4 compared with period 3. ‡‡Earliest age at which a sample was collected from a donor.