| Literature DB >> 24376531 |
Melkaye G Melka1, Michal Abrahamowicz2, Gabriel T Leonard3, Michel Perron4, Louis Richer5, Suzanne Veillette4, Daniel Gaudet6, Tomáš Paus7, Zdenka Pausova1.
Abstract
Visceral fat (VF) promotes the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS), which emerges as early as in adolescence. The clustering of MetS components suggests shared etiologies, but these are largely unknown and may vary between males and females. Here, we investigated the latent structure of pre-clinical MetS in a community-based sample of 286 male and 312 female adolescents, assessing their abdominal adiposity (VF) directly with magnetic resonance imaging. Principal component analysis of the five MetS-defining variables (VF, blood pressure [BP], fasting serum triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and glucose) identified two independent components in both males and females. The first component was sex-similar; it explained >30% of variance and was loaded by all but BP variables. The second component explained >20% of variance; it was loaded by BP similarly in both sexes but additional loading by metabolic variables was sex-specific. This sex-specificity was not detected in analyses that used waist circumference instead of VF. In adolescence, MetS-defining variables cluster into at least two sub-syndromes: (1) sex-similar metabolic abnormalities of obesity-induced insulin resistance and (2) sex-specific metabolic abnormalities associated with BP elevation. These results suggest that the etiology of MetS may involve more than one pathway and that some of the pathways may differ between males and females. Further, the sex-specific metabolic abnormalities associated with BP elevation suggest the need for sex-specific prevention and treatment strategies of MetS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24376531 PMCID: PMC3869691 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Basic characteristics and main outcomes in studied adolescent males and females.
| Characteristic/Outcome | Males | Females | P-value | ||
| N | Mean±SD/N | N | Mean±SD/N | ||
| Age (years) | 286 | 15.0±1.8 | 310 | 15.1±1.9 | 0.37 |
| Height (cm) | 281 | 167.0±10.6 | 306 | 160.1±6.6 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 274 | 59.0±13.8 | 307 | 54.8±10.6 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 276 | 21.2±3.8 | 306 | 21.4±3.6 | 0.64 |
| BMI (log kg/m2) | 276 | 1.32±0.07 | 306 | 1.32±0.07 | 0.60 |
| Visceral fat (cm3)* | 276 | 27.1±28.4 | 296 | 23.4±16.9 | 0.70 |
| Visceral fat (log cm3) | 276 | 1.25±0.38 | 296 | 1.26±0.29 | 0.60 |
| Waist circumference (cm)* | 273 | 72.8±8.9 | 306 | 69.4±8.1 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (log cm) | 273 | 1.86±0.05 | 306 | 1.84±0.05 | <0.001 |
| Supine SBP (mm Hg) | 236 | 118.9±11.5 | 263 | 118.2±10.2 | 0.50 |
| Standing SBP (mm Hg) | 233 | 125.1±13.7 | 259 | 120.1±12.2 | <0.001 |
| Sitting SBP (mm Hg) | 237 | 125.4±13.6 | 262 | 120.2±11.9 | <0.001 |
| Math SBP (mm Hg) | 235 | 140.3±16.8 | 260 | 133.3±15.1 | <0.001 |
| Post-math SBP (mm Hg) | 234 | 128.0±12.6 | 259 | 123.8±12.2 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L)* | 253 | 1.02±0.46 | 277 | 1.07±0.45 | 0.12 |
| Triglycerides (log mmol/L) | 253 | −0.03±0.19 | 277 | −0.01±0.18 | 0.16 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)* | 254 | 1.40±0.28 | 277 | 1.56±0.32 | <0.001 |
| HDL-cholesterol (log mmol/L) | 254 | 0.14±0.09 | 277 | 0.18±0.09 | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mmol/L)* | 254 | 4.80±0.42 | 275 | 4.64±0.43 | <0.001 |
| Glucose (log mmol/L) | 254 | 0.68±0.04 | 275 | 0.66±0.04 | <0.001 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 243 | 67.6±30.5 | 266 | 78.4±28.8 | <0.001 |
BMI: body-mass index. Non-adjusted means and standard deviations are presented. Sex differences were evaluated with Student T-test or with non-parametric Wilcoxon test when data were not normally distributed*.
Figure 1Clustering of MetS-defining variables with visceral fat or waist circumference.
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with either visceral fat (VF) or waist circumference (WC) and remaining four MetS-defining variables: systolic blood pressure (SBP) and fasting serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-chol) and glucose (Glu). To examine whether identified principal components vary across the cardiovascular protocol, the analysis was repeated for each of its five sections (i.e., supine, standing, sitting, stress and stress recovery). Principal components with eigenvalue>1 and loadings of individual MetS-defining variables ≥0.3 were considered significant [33]. These analyses were done in males and females separately and males and females together adjusting for sex (sex-pooled analyses). All variables were adjusted for age and when relevant for height prior to sex-separate PCA and additionally for sex prior to sex-pooled PCA.